Printed from http://www.electronista.com

MacBook Air rumored leaping to Intel Sandy Bridge in June

updated 08:15 am EST, Fri February 11, 2011

MacBook Air may go to Intel Sandy Bridge in June

Apple's move to Intel's Sandy Bridge processors should reach the MacBook Air in June, a rumor asserted on Friday. The claim had few details but would lead to the 11- and 13-inch ultraportables using Core i3, i5 or i7 processors. CNET in providing the details didn't know if the chipset flaw would affect the shipments.

The Air would get a significant leap in performance with the revision. The current models use low voltage and ultra-low voltage Core 2 Duo processors and, while much faster than other notebooks in their size and weight profiles, lag significantly behind even the current full-size MacBooks in speed. They would still likely be slower than any future refreshes of higher end models but would be much more comparable in speed.

Apple is expected to return to using Intel graphics due to the continued Intel ban on NVIDIA chipsets, but the Sandy Bridge architecture eliminates most of the complaints about performance. It can perform roughly as well as low-end dedicated graphics and so far only lacks OpenCL support. The swap may lower the price since Apple wouldn't need a custom-made NVIDIA chipset.

Other updates, such as to the MacBook Pro, could happen soon and may be ready in March if the chipset flaw hasn't held back releases.



By Electronista Staff
toggle

Comments

  1. Inkling

    Dedicated MacNNer

    Joined: Jul 2006

    -1

    Good news indeed!

    This is good news, particularly the June date. As a Scrivener-using writer, I like the MBA's size and weight, but could think of no reason why I should replace my trusty Core 2 Duo MacBook with a model that has the same chip at a slower speed. I prefer upgrades to bring real change not just new packages. A much better CPU and perhaps USB 3.0 would do the trick.

    I just hope Apple does marketing surveys that discover that MBA purchase choices are often driven more by size than CPU power. Potential customers don't want small to mean weak. Quite a few people want a 11" with similar horsepower to the 13". I know. I wanted the 11" size but was turned off by the fact that the 13" clearly offered more bang for the buck as well as a longer battery life.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Crucial MX100 256GB SATA-3 SSD

While the price-per-gigabyte ratio for magnetic platter-based hard drives can't be beat, the speed that a SSD brings to the table for ...

Narrative Clip

With the advent of social media technology, people have been searching for new ways to share the events of their daily lives -- be it ...

Blue's Mikey Digital

Blue Microphones, a company that makes some of the most popular digital USB microphones among podcasters and musicians, has for some t ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News