Printed from

Google's Rubin denies attempts to force anti-fragmentation

updated 10:55 pm EDT, Wed April 6, 2011

Rubin rejects Android fragmentation lockdown claim

Google VP of Engineering and Android lead Andy Rubin in a post late Wednesday vocally denied claims that his company was cracking down on fragmentation in the mobile OS. He insisted Google didn't "believe in a 'one size fits all' solution" and that phone or tablet designers were still free to customize much of the OS. Hardware partners thought of quality and consistency as "top priorities" and, supposedly, anti-fragmentation policies had been in place since the Open Handset Alliance and Android were kicked off in 2007.

Rubin also specifically but paradoxically tackled rumors of standardizing the platform and hardware. Under the allegations, it would reduce the amount of changes developers could make and would argue for a preferred ARM design. Both were untrue, the VP wrote.

"Our approach remains unchanged: there are no lock-downs or restrictions against customizing UIs," he said. "There are not, and never have been, any efforts to standardize the platform on any single chipset architecture."

On withholding source code, the executive was adamant it simply wasn't ready. It would be open-sourced once it ran on phones, he said, implying that it would be Ice Cream and not Android 3.0 (Honeycomb) that would be accessible to developers.

The claims put to rest any direct accusations but also sidestep certain conflicts. Fragmentation under the policies in question has been a major issue, with some companies not shipping updates for months or cancelling them entirely. Only Google's own Nexus phones, the two running completely pure versions of Android, have consistently received updates and new official apps at the same time as they were made available.

Rubin also sidestepped the questions of special deals and other exclusive access. Companies like HTC have complained that LG, Motorola, and Samsung have received special support. The move to withhold source has punished smaller hardware builders and, as implied by Google, may have been a deliberate quality control measure. It has been worried that phone makers would use Android 3.0 prematurely on devices it's not made for, but the move appears to be a reaction to a problem with many small companies using Android 2.x for tablets and creating a poor reputation before the official solution arrived. Apple's success in tablets has been credited in part to a truly optimized experience where even the Samsung Galaxy Tab has many phone-like interface cues.

Suspicions of a required homogenization for Android grew when it became clear that virtually every Android 3.0 tablet had the same NVIDIA Tegra 2 processor and had little to no customization. Google still hasn't explained this but may have simply rushed the OS to beat the iPad.

It further remains untrue that developers have complete freedom to customize the OS. Some very deep parts of the core Android platform are still considered off-limits. Much of the OS is changeable, but Google demands "basic compatibility requirements" and will only give full cooperation for companies that agree to certain conditions for the experience and for branding.

By Electronista Staff


  1. wrenchy

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Nov 2009


    Lovely title

    Where did you macnn girls learn to write?

  1. JeffHarris

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 1999


    Dream On!

    Defragment Android?
    The Impossible Dream!

  1. Foe Hammer

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2005


    Now Here's A Great Chance ...

    ... for Steve Jobs to chime in and define "fragmentation" for the Rubester.

  1. macnews1

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2011



    sweet, way to keep things down Mr. Ballmer.... oh wait, wrong company but same act. hmmmm

  1. kerryb

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001



    Not all Android tablets will be created equal meaning brand identity will suffer. User experience regarding support, updates will be added to the mix. Google is only interested in ad revenue not the compete package like Apple and even Microsoft in comparison. Google has little to loose if consumers have a bad Android moment the ad money will be coming in regardless.

  1. bleee

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: Mar 2002


    Building a good OS or just competing with Apple?

    If Google is just making an mobile OS for the sake of making a good mobile OS why do they care what people do with it? There are lots of different flavors of Linux but Linus Torvalds doesn't say a peep, he doesn't care what other companies do with Linux or what hardware they run it on.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Seagate Wireless

It seems like no matter how much internal storage is included today's mobile devices, we, as users, will always find a way to fill the ...

Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 (Android, 10.1-inch)

Lenovo is building a bigger name for itself year after year, including its devices expanding beyond desktop computers. The company's l ...

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, the process is not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often t ...



Most Commented


Popular News