Printed from

Google used Android compatibility as 'club' against Skyhook

updated 02:30 pm EDT, Mon May 9, 2011

Skyhook lawsuit docs show Google pressure

A set of newly unsealed messages from the ongoing Skyhook lawsuit against Google may have supported Skyhook's claims that Google was abusing its control over Android to shut out competing services. After a brief test that it believed proved Google's own geolocation was better than Skyhook's, Android product manager Steve Lee and others concluded that Skyhook's then-new deal with Motorola was dangerous for Google's business. The company was worried that it would cut off the improvement of Android's location database accuracy and looked like it began seeding concerns about compatibility primarily in a bid to get Skyhook's competition out.

While Android compatibility is a concern for Google, language from an August 6, 2010 e-mail from Android manager Dan Morrill suggested that the company was fully aware it was using compatibility terms to exclude Skyhook, the New York Times said. To him, hardware partners were already aware of the practice.

"We are using compatibility as a club to make them do things we want," Morrill said.

Google has contended that Motorola's break with Skyhook made no mention of technical compatibility issues, but it didn't have an explanation for contradiction in the e-mail and declined to talk to the newspaper about their content. The official break in the deal did mention Google's "contractual rights" to get information about users.

The company has repeatedly tried to portray Android as open but has attracted mounting criticism that its openness is selective. Along with letting carriers lock down phones to prevent certain kinds of apps or features, it has been chastised for its reluctance to offer source code as frequently as it has in the past.

For Android 3.0, Google said that the code wasn't usable for open source in its current state, although the firm has admitted that this also prevents Android 3.0 from getting on to non-sanctioned tablets. Critics have argued that this was the real motivation as Google wanted to prevent the rash of poorly made Android 2.2 tablets that helped cement Apple's lead with the iPad.

By Electronista Staff


  1. squirrellydw

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2010


    Do no evil

    Do no evil, RIGHT

  1. joecab

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2004


    using something as a club to get your way ...

    ... that sounds vaguely familiar ....

  1. macnews1

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2011


    Getting it from both ends

    Google says everything is open and then they have to pull back when they see how that fails in the market and for the vast majority of consumers. Then the same group they relied upon to help convince the mother, brother and sister to buy Android gets it in the shorts when the code starts to go closed. They feel ripped off, lied to and cheated. Yet Google has to make a business decision to move forward.

    I don't want to be in their shoes from a PR stand point, though would love to have a few bucks from their wallets for all the time they sold my personal info.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Neurio Intelligent Home Monitor

The recently released Neurio Intelligent Home Monitor is a piece of hardware that, when integrated into a home's breaker box, monitors ...

Apple 13-inch MacBook Pro (Early 2015)

Although the new darling of the Apple MacBook line up is the all-new MacBook, Apple has given its popular 13-inch MacBook Pro with Ret ...

Seagate Wireless

It seems like no matter how much internal storage is included today's mobile devices, we, as users, will always find a way to fill the ...



Most Commented


Popular News