Printed from

Intel promises x86 phones early 2012, 14nm Atom chips

updated 03:05 pm EDT, Tue May 17, 2011

Intel shifts to lower-power Atoms for phones, more

Intel during investment presentations Tuesday promised a more definite track for his company's struggling mobile plans. At one event, CEO Paul Otellini said the company's earlier plan for mobile was "inadequate" and would focus on even lower-powered designs that would move twice as quickly as Moore's Law. Along with the 32 nanometer version of the Atom, Saltwell, the executive also acknowledged the 22nm Silvermont and ultimately a 14nm version, Airmont, within three years.

The emphasis was now less on mainstream notebook processors and more on ultra-mobile hardware such as phones and tablets, he said. Even notebooks would eventually get to 15W peak power instead of the typical 25W and 35W of today. Smartphones would arrive sometime in the first half of 2012 through unnamed partners.

Intel's executive VP for mobile, David Perlmutter, clarified some of the plans. He promised "thin-and-light devices at mainstream laptop prices." Many Intel-based devices in the future would have the features commonly attributed to tablets today, such as instant-on, persistent Internet access and 10-hour battery life, he said. There would also be more instances of crossover hardware that could flip between PC and tablet designs.

"In two years we expect that Intel-based devices will combine the best attributes of PCs and tablets," he added.

Otellini at the same time acknowledged that Intel had been reeling from Nokia's decision to switch to Windows Phone and deemphasize MeeGo, the OS it had been developing with Intel. The CEO admitted that Intel had been putting all its hopes on Nokia and working "almost exclusively" with the Finnish company. What work had been done was made into a reference design being pitched to companies as an example.

He once more hinted that the sudden departure of the ultramobile lead was actually a forced departure and touted the "new management" of the mobile group as a sign it would succeed. The presentation gave Otellini a chance to jab ARM, claiming that Intel actually made more revenue on tablets. Windows 8 wouldn't work well on ARM since Microsoft would have to adapt it to four different ARM variants, effectively porting it four times, he said.

The executive likewise didn't believe that Apple had locked up the tablet market with the iPad or that ARM had too much of a lead, arguing that it was still too early to say. An Intel-based Android device might be unveiled as soon as Tuesday as proof of Intel's plans, which saw 2,000 Atom-based systems and 21 percent of them defections from rivals like ARM.

"The tablet race is nowhere near finished," he said. "No one knows the size of this market... It will require a tremendous amount of experimentation here for several years."

By Electronista Staff


  1. Mr. Strat

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Jan 2002



    That's probably the one thing the Atom chip could do well is run a cell phone. They're not worth a s*** for netbooks.

  1. boris_cleto

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2002



    Isn't just a river in Egypt.

  1. icewing

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2008


    We're Intel

    We never saw this coming...but then we put together a plan...which fell apart. But no worries, when we eventually catch up with everyone else, we're confident that there will be a few scraps left for us on the floor!

  1. SockRolid

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Jan 2010


    A sad a-hole can't make a happy f***.

    "The tablet race is nowhere near finished," he said.

    Depends on how you define "finished." Apple has a 99.8% share of the enterprise pad computing market. And now that RIM has recalled 1000 of their no-hope PlayBooks, maybe that percentage has increased to 99.9%.

  1. BigMac2

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Dec 2000


    Intel play a game they can't win.

    I think Intel effort to bring x86 chip to mobile device is fatally flawed. Intel can try to achieve ultralow power consumption by reducing the fabrication process, but any gain they will get that way, ARM processor can achieve better on the same fab process.

    ARM will be forever more efficient than x86 architecture.

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001


    Re: A sad a-hole

    Gee, I guess that means Apple has a monopoly share of the tablet market. Which means Apple is now open to all sorts of trade and commerce reviews and investigations by various branches of the gov't over possible antitrust issues or the like (you know, like complaints from publications that Apple is strong-arming deals out of them because Apple knows they control the whole medium).

    Oh, right, at that point Apple has lots of competitors and people aren't 'forced' to use their devices. You know, the MS defense.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Seagate Wireless

It seems like no matter how much internal storage is included today's mobile devices, we, as users, will always find a way to fill the ...

Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 (Android, 10.1-inch)

Lenovo is building a bigger name for itself year after year, including its devices expanding beyond desktop computers. The company's l ...

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, the process is not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often t ...



Most Commented


Popular News