Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Video phone patent holder sues Apple, AT&T, US Cellular

updated 09:45 am EDT, Thu May 26, 2011

Visual Interactive sues Apple, US carriers

Non-contributing patent holder Visual Interactive Phone Concepts has sued Apple, AT&T, and US Cellular for allegedly violating two patents for video phones. The three Michigan-based lawsuits claim that the three companies violate the patents, both describing a "videophone interactive mailbox facility system," but through questionable means. Apple was accused of violating the patent simply for making a video-capable phone in the iPhone and offering services like the App Store, iTunes, and the iBookstore; AT&T and US Cellular were both targeted for having music and video services as well as content stores that happened to be on video phones.

The claims stretched the definition of the services to make them fit their descriptions of a mailbox system despite none of the claims targeting messaging or any of the apps in dispute having mailboxes. Any e-commerce system with a main datacenter that facilitated ordering and delivering content qualified, the patent holder argued.

Nevada-based Visual Interactive has sued before, in 2007, but at the time targeted smaller companies less likely to fight back, such as Cricket's parent company Leap Wireless as well as Big Planet and Infogear. It successfully received settlements. The motivation behind the new round of lawsuits isn't clear but is likely to use earlier cases as precedents for targeting wealthier companies.

The firm fits the traditional description of a patent troll as it has no creative output and relies solely on patent royalties and lawsuit settlements for its existence. Accordingly, it has accused the companies of intentionally violating the patents, despite the lack of direct evidence, so that it can collect tripled damages if it gets to a successful trial.

A win, either in a settlement or a court case, could have dangerous repercussions for Google, Motorola, Verizon, and the other companies not yet sued, since they too often have some kind of messaging or content service that would fit the deliberately broadened interpretation of the patents. [via Florian Mueller]

Visual Interactive vs. Apple

Visual Interactive vs. AT&T

Visual Interactive vs. US Cellular



By Electronista Staff
toggle

Comments

    Comment buried. Show
  1. Geoduck

    Junior Member

    Joined: Jan 2010

    -11

    There are some

    of these suits that might have merit. A few of them that I think might in some way actually be looking to protect legitimate Intellectual Property rights.

    This isn't one of those cases.

    To call these people 'patent trolls' is to insult patent trolls. They are nothing more than a legal team mafiosi. IMO this is borderline criminal behavior. A protection racket scheme that attempts to have the US Court system be their 'muscle'. An attempt to extort money from companies under the threat of a court sanctioned beat down.

    Comment buried. Show
  1. cwsmith

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2007

    -11

    If I recall correctly ...

    The folks at Hanna-Barbera showed a video phone in every weekly episode of The Jetsons. Obviously Visual Interactive Phone Concepts stole the idea from *them* !!

    Comment buried. Show
  1. TomSawyer

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2008

    -12

    Can someone tell me

    why a Michigan court is accepting cases where neither the plaintiff nor defendant are HQ'd??? Is it for the convenience of the bloodsucking law firms submitting the case?

    Comment buried. Show
  1. Thomasbeau

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2000

    -10

    My next patent

    It almost sounds like this guy patented something that wasn't really invented yet? More or less something that will be here when technology catches up to the idea, and as already stated, an old idea (see "The Jetsons"). I think I will patent the "Transporter". Someday when it is created, I can sue and profit off someone else's development.

  1. Eldernorm

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2007

    -7

    Dumb patent trolls

    As any good patent troll can tell you, the place to sue is not in Eastern Michigan, but Eastern TEXAS (ie Marshall, Tx.)

    How dumb can these guys get??

    Just a thought,
    en

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Tablo DVR

With over-the-top content options growing past Hulu and Netflix, consumers may be finding it harder to justify paying a monthly fee fo ...

Sound Blaster Roar Bluetooth speaker

There could very well be a new king of the hill for Bluetooth speakers, with Sound Blaster's recent entry into the marketplace. Bringi ...

Kenu Airframe Plus

Simple, stylish and effective, the Kenu Airframe + portable car mount is the latest addition to Kenu's lineup. Released earlier this y ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News