Printed from

Legal precedent vs. carpet-bomb patent suits may hurt Lodsys

updated 01:25 pm EDT, Wed August 10, 2011

Eon-Net loss may hurt Lodsys too

A recent decision in a patent lawsuit from Eon-Net against Flagstar Bancorp might pose trouble for Lodsys in its own attempts to skim royalties. Discovered today, a ruling late last month hit Eon-Net with Rule 11 sanctions for conducting what was cast as "extortion" through its practices. The company had submitted over 100 infringement lawsuits but each time gave the targets a settlement that would be cheaper than defending the case, effectively forcing companies to pay.

Eon-Net had "acted in bad faith," even apart from what was found to be an "objectively baseless" case, the court ruled. It dismissed the idea that the settlements proved the patents were valid, since Flagstar had to spend $600,000 to defend the case but had been offered a settlement if it paid $25,000 to $75,000. The tenfold increase in cost guaranteed that few if any would ever challenge whether or not the patents were valid.

As a non-practicing entity, or a company that doesn't make meaningful products, Eon-Net was also immune to countersuits that would challenge its activities. It had to pay a total of $631,135 for the case, three quarters of which were Flagstar's court costs.

Lodsys may face trouble as its own approach has been very similar. It has been sending out blanket patent infringement notices and, in each case, has been making patent license offers with direct hints that the value would be much cheaper than defending against a lawsuit. When it ultimately decided to sue, Lodsys deliberately chose developers that were too small to fight back and only included bigger developers like EA and Rovio to try and reduce the weight of Apple's arguments that it needed to intervene for a proper defense.

The Lodsys case won't necessarily go the same direction. Lodsys already has licenses with Apple and Google, and it may point to these as evidence that its patents have merit. With individual app writers banding together, though, they may still show collective evidence of violations that would merit sanctions and could damage Lodsys more if they win the case. [via TechDirt]

By Electronista Staff


  1. BigMac2

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Dec 2000


    Everythings wrong with software patent

    Software Patent should be ban, and pieces of software should be protect by copyright only. One man patent company like Lodsys should be rule unlawful. Nor Lodsys or the patent itself produce a single line of code proving this patent got a real world application based on.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Razer Kraken Pro headset

Gaming headphones are a challenge to get right, for a long list of reasons that are unique to the consumer buying them. Some shoppers ...

Patriot Aero Wireless Mobile Drive

Regardless of how large a tablet you buy, you always want more space. There's always one more movie or another album you'd cram on, if ...

Patriot Fuel+ 6000 and 9000mAh batteries

Mobile device batteries are better than they used to be, but there's always a scenario where users could use more juice. Upgrade manuf ...



Most Commented


Popular News