Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Nokia echoes Microsoft: Android, iPhone app ideas 'outdated'

updated 12:00 pm EDT, Wed August 10, 2011

Nokia argues WP7 app model superio to Android, iOS

Nokia's North America lead Chris Weber took quickly to shadowing Microsoft's perspective in an interview late Tuesday. He claimed that the app as a primary concept on Android and iPhone devices was "outdated." Apple had largely established a concept of frequently jumping in and out, but Google "commoditized it" without really changing anything, he told VentureBeat in the chat.

Again repeating Microsoft's point of view, he argued that Windows Phone was better through its concepts of live tiles and themed hubs, where users can either check information from the home screen alone or can accomplish what would normally take multiple apps, such as reaching a contact through Facebook and text messaging. On Android and iOS, the icons are static, and some of the information is put into silos.

Mango will build on this with live tiles that jump directly to certain parts of an app or hub. Voice commands also allow completely hands-off voice commands and text-to-speech.

The commends come in spite of Microsoft's concept so far failing to have any meaningful impact. Windows Phone has so far done little to stop share losses as most Windows Mobile users have preferred to switch to Android or iPhones rather than stay loyal to Microsoft. Many have seen the deal with a Nokia as an effective attempt to buy market share where it couldn't achieve the same with HTC, LG, Samsung, and others.

Nokia is mostly hinging its Windows Phone success on its reputation for hardware, such as its high-powered cameras. Its sheer size as a phone maker may also help, although it has been dwindling in that area as budget Chinese phones and low-end Android have taken away from its footprint.

Weber's comments are at least partly determined by necessity. Nokia is dropping all Symbian in the US and will only have Windows Phone to sell, leaving him little choice but to endorse Microsoft.



By Electronista Staff
toggle

Comments

  1. woodsmanlw

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2010

    +13

    The market will speak

    People will go for the app model or the live panel model, either way the market will speak. What is technologically better may not be what people want. In addition there is more to it than just the software. There is an entire ecosystem involved with hardware, software, delivery mechanisms etc. The market will decide based on these plus factors like cost, ease of use, etc. Sure it was good for Nokia to kill Symbian but its choice of Winmobile as a winner is yet to be seen (and from the current trend its not looking good).

  1. facebook_Allan

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Aug 2011

    +16

    That's so funny

    The truth is that Nokia and Microsoft are the "outdated" ones. They always copied and played catch up. If they have been innovative at all, it's barely noticeable.

  1. facebook_Donald

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Aug 2011

    +9

    Doesn't Matter

    I agree with woosmanlw. Betamax was arguably better than VHS. The Mac OS was arguably better than Windows. Marketing, advertising, and publicity made the VHS and Windows more desired than Betamax and the Mac. Beta died and the Mac almost died even though they were better. It doesn't matter if, by Chris Weber's obviously subjective beliefs, Windows Phone is "better." What matters is what people want and will buy. And people don't want Windows Phone. Bzzzz. Sorry. Try again?

  1. The Vicar

    Junior Member

    Joined: Jul 2009

    +8

    Oooh, yes!

    Dunno about you, but what I want from a tablet or phone is for it to run all its programs all the time all at once, and put the output into subsections of a screen which is already small. I certainly don't mind if it means the battery lasts about 20 minutes!

  1. aristotles

    Grizzled Veteran

    Joined: Jul 2004

    +9

    Yes, square tiles are obviously superior. NOT!

    The whole square tile concept was seen on various websites in the past. It is not new or innovative. They just have made an uglier widget that is square instead of an arbitrary shape. Widgets are a nice thing to have but they are not a replacement for a full fledged program nor should they be used as a replacement for an icon.

  1. Jeronimo2000

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +13

    Wow, that's rich...

    ... coming from someone who's leading a company that just screams "outdated" with everything they have done in the past couple of years.

  1. blshaw

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2010

    +10

    Brilliant!

    Another brilliant, insightful observation by yet another looser in the technology marketplace (of the Steve Balmer ilk; now there's a genius!). When you can't innovate, you copy. When you can't copy, disparage the leader. Let's see: according to CNN yesterday, Apple and Exxon/Mobile were alternating back and forth all day as the highest capitalized company ON THE PLANET! How can that possibly be the case if the only people buying Apple products are ignorant lemmings who can't appreciate how superior Windoze Phone is? Answer: Apple's customers are not ignorant lemmings. They are thoughtful, knowledgable, discerning shoppers. They won't buy c***.

  1. BigMac2

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Dec 2000

    +6

    Tiles interface better?

    Microsoft have much to prove on their Metro UI. It is elegant for sure, but I wonder how well it will play when third party will start to fill those screen with bad design. In my sense, the iPhone and Android OS do a much better job for Apps centric application while Microsoft try to make a appliance OS where everything is mashed in their home screen.

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +2

    he's right

    The 'app' model has been outdated for years. Unfortunately no one wants to change. Apple tried with OpenDoc back in the early 90s, but it never took off.

    The model should be more concerned with "what am I trying to do?" not "what app do I need to run to do what I want to do?"

    However, I doubt this guy has the answer, either. Apple's answer on OS X is apparently "The user wants their computer to act like their iPhone". Don't think that's the answer either.

  1. coffeetime

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: Nov 2006

    +4

    This is like...

    Palm all over again.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

DoxieGo Portable Scanner

Sometimes, people need to scan things, but having a computer at hand to do so isn't exactly feasible. Maybe it's the home of a relativ ...

Dell AD211 Bluetooth speaker

For all of the high-priced, over-engineered Bluetooth speakers in the electronics market, there is still room for mass-market solution ...

VisionTek 128GB USB Pocket SSD

USB flash drives dealt the death blow to both the floppy and Zip drives. While still faster than either of the old removable media, sp ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News