Printed from

FCC grills AT&T on merger after real LTE costs exposed

updated 08:05 pm EDT, Wed August 24, 2011

FCC wants more info on ATT LTE needs

The FCC on Wednesday asked AT&T for evidence to justify its view that its $39 billion buyout of T-Mobile was necessary for its LTE network. Following an inadvertent leak by AT&T's lawyers that revealed it only needed $3.8 billion to reach its touted 95 to 97 percent coverage of the US population, agency officials wanted to know what the T-Mobile merger would do that the much cheaper proposal would not. Concerns exist that AT&T is using rural 4G expansion as a pretext for an ultimate goal of eliminating a major competitor.

In the leaked copy, AT&T had said there was "no viable business case" for spending $3.8 billion in January but, just two months later, was willing to spend over ten times as much. Even when confronted with its own evidence to the contrary, the carrier has insisted that the deal was necessary. It has pointed to additional benefits that it claims would be passed on to customers, such as denser coverage in existing areas and rolling out 4G faster than it would otherwise.

Critics have raised the possibility of a cost discrepancy from the start. Without much publicly accessible information, however, most arguments have focused on the clearer competition issues. AT&T has insisted that the market would remain competitive and pointed to smaller carriers like US Cellular or Cricket as proof. Most of these, however, are regional carriers that often just have a small fraction of AT&T's share and have no realistic opportunity to compete.

Sprint, which would immediately stand to lose from the AT&T deal, has gone so far as to propose a solution for AT&T that would tap its unused spectrum and move faster to 4G to avoid the crunch without requiring T-Mobile. The data hasn't been tested and might be a shorter-term fix.

AT&T is already facing tighter FCC and DOJ scrutiny over the move. It has tried to rally support from companies and advocacy groups to help get through the approval process. Opponents have called these into question, since virtually all of these groups have received contributions from AT&T or otherwise have a financial motivation to back the deal. GLAAD's leader very publicly resigned after members criticized him for backing the AT&T deal when it has no bearing on the organization's causes and when AT&T contributions biased the endorsement.

By Electronista Staff


  1. lamewing

    Dedicated MacNNer

    Joined: Aug 2004



    If this deal is given the green light by the FCC it proves that the FCC can be paid off.

  1. Bobfozz

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2008


    comment title

    your comment

  1. Bobfozz

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2008


    seldom does the government...

    deny big business what it wants... and the customer almost always gets stuck at the end. Maybe this time the FCC will have the guts to say "no" unlike their willingness to let others interfere with net neutrality.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Dell AD211 Bluetooth speaker

For all of the high-priced, over-engineered Bluetooth speakers in the electronics market, there is still room for mass-market solution ...

VisionTek 128GB USB Pocket SSD

USB flash drives dealt the death blow to both the floppy and Zip drives. While still faster than either of the old removable media, sp ...

Kodak PixPro SL10 Smart Lens Camera

Smartphone imagery still widely varies. Large Megapixel counts don't make for a good image, and the optics in some devices are lacking ...



Most Commented


Popular News