Microsoft sued over location tracking in Windows Phone 7

updated 05:55 pm EDT, Wed August 31, 2011

Microsoft accused of ignoring WP7 location info


Microsoft faced a lawsuit on Wednesday accusing it of violating privacy in Windows Phone 7. The federal Seattle suit claims that the phone's camera app marks the location over GPS even after the owner switches the feature off. The user, Rebecca Cousineau, further accused Microsoft of false testimony when it wrote Congress claiming that it only ever got location information with consent.

The lawsuit is intended as a class action and could see all Windows Phone 7 owners receive a payment from Microsoft if successful. Exact damages weren't mentioned.

Microsoft hasn't commented on the complaint but is expected to contest the accusations.

The lawsuit may prove a symbolic problem for Microsoft. Apple and Google have also been accused of collecting excess location data. Both, however, have either more explicitly outlined why they believe their location methods are permissions-based or have taken direct action. Apple released iOS 4.3.3 to cut back on the amount of data it collected and to better secure what was left. Google hasn't changed its approach but does, as a general rule, pop up a notice asking for permission any time it or an app developer needs location information.

US government officials have been increasingly scrutinizing the truth of the claims. A proposed Senate bill would make consent a matter of law rather than just a voluntary gesture.


By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. simon42

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2010

    -1

    Apple will sue them then

    Once again, they do what Apple did first. When will the copycats learn? I hope Apple sues them.


  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +1

    huh?

    The federal Seattle suit claims that the phone's camera app marks the location over GPS even after the owner switches the feature off. The user, Rebecca Cousineau, further accused Microsoft of false testimony when it wrote Congress claiming that it only ever got location information with consent.

    Wow, who knew what is most likely a software bug can be called giving 'false testimony'. I seriously doubt the MS honchos and techs got together and were like "Hey, s**** the flag. We want to GPS every picture they take! That way we can track them down when we want!"

    The lawsuit may prove a symbolic problem for Microsoft. Apple and Google have also been accused of collecting excess location data. Both, however, have either more explicitly outlined why they believe their location methods are permissions-based or have taken direct action.

    How may this be proved a "symbolic problem"? And Apple and Google both had the same issues, but they got to 'change' things to fix it, but MS is, what, stuck? Can't they do the same mea culpa the others did?


  1. facebook_Eric

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Sep 2011

    0

    Suit == false

    I think the suit is false. I tried the same sequence of steps, and my camera hub on 7712 didn’t include location information on the pics.

    Also note that full location settings are not all in the camera. There are other location settings. Saying that the "scheme is perpetrated through the camera app" is lies. If the other location services are turned on, then Bing uses them.

    If they are turned off, Bing can't use them.

    For instance, when Bing search is first brought up, it asks whether the user’s location may be used. If the user answers “cancel”, the new “local scout” icon doesn’t come up, and Bing can’t find the user on the map.

    There is also another location-based question which needs to be taken seriously -- on the "Sign in" capability in the Me application. In those settings, the user can opt in or out of using location information to find places nearby to them (which makes an automatic sign in list and avoids the user having to type "Picadilly Cafeteria at Walla Walla Washington Mall Complex" or something equally difficult to type),

    Sounds like someone who doesn’t understand the phone, or a fame-seeker, or a fanboy or girl of some type.

    If this location tracking is real, tell us “EXACTLY” how it works. No secrets

    I'm also quite concerned that our Washington Lawmakers think they have the time or the right to create rulings on technical issues they don't understand. I hope to God these guys don't start creating laws to "protect us" and then make all smartphones GPS' capabilities useless.

    I have a much better ideas what Washington can work on... as a matter of fact, about one trillion of them.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News