Printed from

Judge OKs all but one Oracle copyright claim against Google

updated 07:40 pm EDT, Thu September 15, 2011

Google loses most of summary judgment vs Oracle

Google faced a major setback to its defense against Oracle's lawsuit over Java in Android after Judge William Alsup tossed out most of Google's motions to dismiss parts of the case. The court denied all but one of Google's summary judgment requests over the copyright claims. Judge Alsup only agreed with Google that the names of files and sub-elements like classes weren't copyrightable.

The court sided with Oracle in saying that copyright dispute had to be handled file by file, not for Java as a whole. Google also hadn't been specific about what related programming interfaces were necessary to the infringing code and thus had been made exempt. Specifications for interfaces were protected by copyright even if there names weren't, the judge said, and a fair use benefit to Java couldn't be objectively proven in court.

The ruling didn't come to a conclusion on patent or copyright violations but meant Oracle could largely try for the full extent of damages. Judge Alsup's wording also suggested he disapproved of Google apparently ignoring risks and deciding to take its chances that Sun, which Oracle acquired in 2010, would approve of Java use without a license or other permission.

Oracle has been hoping for billions of dollars in licensing payments from Google for the purported copying. Google's hope in the near future may center around forced settlement talks that could see the two sides reach a deal rather than risk handing a major payout to Oracle or possible bans on Android devices in the US. [via Florian Mueller]

11-09-15 Oracle v. Google Decision on SJ Copyright

By Electronista Staff


  1. garmonbosia

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2002


    As I said before...

    This is going to be a bloodbath.

  1. rvhernandez

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2005


    Droid does

    get phuct with no vaseline.

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001



    Useless motion to dismiss mostly denied. What a shock, happens in every court case about anything.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Cat B100

Cat is primarily known for its heavy-duty machinery used in the construction industry and farming, among other areas. What may not be ...

Linksys EA6900 AC Router

As 802.11ac networking begins to makes its way into more and more devices, you may find yourself considering an upgrade for your home ...

D-Link DIR-510L 802.11AC travel router

Having Internet access in hotels and other similar locations used to be a miasma of connectivity issues. If Wi-Fi was available, it wa ...



Most Commented


Popular News