Microsoft says 'traditional' PCs up 14%, hints iPad effect

updated 06:30 pm EDT, Thu October 20, 2011

Microsoft justifies slow PC business in results


Microsoft in discussing its summer results Thursday was evasive on acknowledging the iPad's effect on PC sales. It estimated that the PC field as a whole grew just one to three percent but used metrics that made it seem bigger, claiming that Windows copies for "traditional" PCs, excluding netbooks and Windows tablets, were up 14 percent. The software developer also pointed to business PCs growing five percent to a new high of 35 million.

The company admitted that consumer sales were "flat," but spun this as a decline in netbooks. No numbers were disclosed, although Intel revealed that Atom sales fell 32 percent in the summer.

While conventional notebooks and desktops aren't as vulnerable to tablets, analysts have noted that tablets are replacing and expanding on netbooks. In those areas where they're considered more affordable, they have sometimes been appealing to those who don't like or are intimidated by the complexity of traditional computers. iPads are about 68 percent of tablet sales so far.

Mac sales also haven't been dragged down in the same ways Windows PCs have. IDC estimates showed Macs growing by 22 percent in the same period. Although still much smaller in overall share, it has so far been largely immune to the economic factors and upgrade resistance that triggered declines in Windows revenue for the first half of the year.

Microsoft isn't expected to begin addressing tablet share more significantly until Windows 8 launches, most likely sometime in 2012.


By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. slapppy

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2008

    +5

    Forced

    Yep forced corporate IT/CIO purchases! lol


  1. prl99

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2009

    +9

    just numbers

    I work for a government contractor and we pay a ton for Microsoft maintenance. I just checked and we still haven't converted anywhere near half our original XP boxes to W7 (currently 9000-XP and 5900-W7). Of course, Microsoft says we have 15K-20K W7 licenses, which is what they report as "sales" even though these are simply numbers on a site license.


  1. SockRolid

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +2

    XP is still "good enough"

    Like prl99 said, most companies "still haven't converted anywhere near half of our original XP boxes to W7."

    There's nothing wrong with "good enough," of course. Unless you're trying to sell new stuff.

    But selling new stuff requires the new stuff to be "better enough" to buy. And that's Microsoft's big problem, isn't it? W7 just isn't "better enough." (Ignoring the whole Vista Disaster, of course...)


  1. SierraDragon

    Mac Elite

    Joined: Mar 2004

    +4

    Win7 is good enough

    W7 is a decent OS if you are corporate IT needing to stay in that ecosystem. And MS is ending XP support which of course means death because no Win version can survive long without life support.

    Right now about half the XP IT users have (after 11 years) shifted to W7. Once XP users have all upgraded to Win7do not look for much further upgrading to Win8 or Win9. MS is in a pickle. Their users realize frequent desktop OS and Office upgrades are bunk, slowly killing their old revenue stream while they innovate nothing.

    There is a reason MS has lost about a third of shareholder value in 4 years. But the execs at the top still take home millions.


  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -2

    'good enough'

    One reason for XP's still dominance is the same culture you all deride them for, the "we don't want to learn new stuff" IT departments. They're a bunch of lazy idiots too afraid to admit they screwed up purchasing some software that was written so poorly that it isn't compatible with Windows 7, so they blame MS for the issues. And then the Apple fanboys crow about how XP is still the most popular OS and all.

    At least MS (a) gives you the option to install XP, and (b) wrote the OS so that it could work on newer hardware. Just try to install Snow Leopard on a new mac, say a mini. Oh, wait, can't. Apparently it needs a new driver, and since Apple controls everything, they decided not to support the older OS on new hardware.

    But that's where you then yell at the IT department for not keeping all their software up-to-date or switching to new software that doesn't rely on supposedly out-dated technologies.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News