Printed from

Barnes & Noble asks DOJ to check Microsoft antitrust issues

updated 05:45 pm EST, Tue November 8, 2011

Barnes and Noble says Microsoft licenses illegal

Barnes & Noble has quietly taken its allegations of Microsoft antitrust abuse to a formal level, according to newly-publicized documents. The company is now known to have sent a letter to the Department of Justice's chief competition counsel Gene Kimmelman on October 17 claiming that Microsoft's anti-Android patent licensing campaign was meant to artificially "drive out competition" and make companies choose Windows-based platforms. It contended that Microsoft's lawsuit against Barnes & Noble, Foxconn, and Inventec was more to silence competition from the Nook and other devices than any attempt to protect claimed innovations.

Microsoft was undergoing a "series of tactics... to raise its rivals' costs and prevent Android-based devices from taking away sales of Microsoft's Windows operating system," the bookseller said.

The Windows developer has claimed to have an effective ownership of Android through patents that requires royalties for any commercial use of the OS. Regardless of the intentions, however, Barnes & Noble had previously accused Microsoft of setting an unrealistically high royalty rate that would hike the price of its Android-based Nook readers by a significant margin. According to the book chain, Microsoft purportedly wanted to charge much more than for a phone because of the vague similarity of the Nook to a tablet, and therefore a computer, even though Barnes & Noble couldn't have switched to any Microsoft OS.

Others, including Google, have leveled similar accusations that Microsoft's campaign has little to do with patent rights and more to try and push out competitors so that it can get the dominance of the mobile OS market that it enjoys on the desktop. Microsoft has always denied the claims but has conspicuously avoided defending the legitimacy of its patents, only insisting that Google is trying to change the rules. It didn't start pressing for licenses and suing resisters until spring 2010, when Windows Phone 7 was public and Android was much larger.

DOJ officials haven't given clues as to whether they will act on Barnes & Noble's dispute. [via Bloomberg]

By Electronista Staff


  1. facebook_Gerhard

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Nov 2011


    Your kidding right!.

    if you use a partially stolen Os on your reader device, and then complain when someone wants to be paid a fee for using some of their Ip, how can that be stifling competition. Hey!, how about this, I will steel some (not all) of your books, rent them cheap to some of my friends, and then take you to task for asking that I pay you to do so.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Moshi iVisor AG and XT for iPad Air 2

Have you ever tried to put in a screen protector that relies on static to cling to the screen? How many bubbles and wrinkles does it h ...

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500 projector

Trying to find the perfect projector for a home theater can be tricky, as there are bountiful options on the market from a large numbe ...

Thecus N2310 NAS

For every computer user, there comes a point of critical mass in data storage. When it hits, external hard drives, USB sticks and DVD ...



Most Commented


Popular News