Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Carrier IQ, HTC, Samsung sued for alleged wiretapping

updated 11:45 am EST, Fri December 2, 2011

HTC and Samsung targets of privacy class actions

Carrier IQ and its partners may have faced repercussions for policies Thursday after it was sued in Chicago (below) and St. Louis over its data tracking controversy. The potential class actions from Erin Janek and others accuse Carrier IQ, HTC, and Samsung of violating the Federal Wiretap Act by intercepting data and voice without owners' permissions. They take the position that Carrier IQ's software, which on Android is hidden and not normally removable, was recording keystrokes and messages.

If cleared to go forward as class actions representing all owners with Carrier IQ-equipped devices, the cases would collect at least $5 million each by definition. The money would presumably be paid out across all users in small amounts each.

Whether or not the companies violate any laws isn't certain and might depend on interpretation. Carrier IQ itself has said that it sees but doesn't record personal information. Just by seeing the content with its monitoring tools, however, it may be seen as intercepting data it wasn't supposed to access.

HTC and Samsung themselves have mostly put the blame on carriers like AT&T and Sprint, which haven't been targeted by the lawsuit but which Carrier IQ acknowledges are its main customers. They have usually said they only get network-related information, but their insistence on including the tracking software could make them liable as well.

Apple is likely to be exempt from any lawsuits. Since it has control over its platform, it made Carrier IQ opt-in only and didn't include any keystroke or message filtering. The software is gone as of iOS 5 where HTC and Samsung are still using Carrier IQ today. [via paidContent]

Class Action against Carrier IQ_ HTC



By Electronista Staff
toggle

Comments

  1. prl99

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Mar 2009

    +3

    who gets the money?

    The lawyers, that's who. $5M among the users means $1 or less each, especially after the lawyers take their huge cut. I agree something needs to be done but the money the people actually get is usually so insignificant it hardly warrants the courts time.

  1. SockRolid

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +4

    Control is good

    Re: "Apple is likely to be exempt from any lawsuits. Since it has control over its platform, it made Carrier IQ opt-in only and didn't include any keystroke or message filtering."

    And people say that Apple is too controlling.
    Think again.

  1. SergioRS

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2004

    +1

    Lawyers and Class Action

    I'm part of a class for having been overcharged by my homeowner's insurance. I've been informed I am entitled to $.84 (84 cents) per year that I had a policy. The lawyers get $2,320,000 of the $6,500,000 award total. That said, while I hope this ends the practice and destroys Carrier IQ, I suspect there's quite a bit of 4 point type on page 5635 of the carrier's contracts explaining how no one gets a say in this.

    "The first thing we do, kill all the lawyers." d*** the Butcher, Shakespeare's Henry VI

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Cat B100

Cat is primarily known for its heavy-duty machinery used in the construction industry and farming, among other areas. What may not be ...

Linksys EA6900 AC Router

As AC networking begins to makes its way into more and more devices you may find yourself considering an upgrade for your home network ...

D-Link DIR-510L 802.11AC travel router

Having Internet access in hotels and other similar locations used to be a miasma of connectivity issues. If Wi-Fi was available, it wa ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News