Proview attempts to block Chinese iPad by suing resellers

updated 11:20 am EST, Wed December 7, 2011

 

Settlement with Apple likely resolution


Fresh off a successful defense against a related Apple lawsuit, Proview Technology is trying to block iPad sales by suing Apple resellers in southern China, says the Financial Times. Currently Proview is targeting vendors in Shenzhen and Huizhou. "We are starting with these two cities, and if we are successful in getting iPad sales stopped, we will consider going after Apple resellers elsewhere in China," says Xie Xianghui, a lawyer working with Grandall, one of the lawfirms acting on behalf of Proview.

An initial case will be heard in the Shenzhen Futian District Court on December 30th, while another is scheduled for January 7th at the Huizhou Intermediate People’s Court. Apple may choose to appeal the outcome of its lawsuit however, which could put Proview's efforts in jeopardy. Regardless Apple could try offering a settlement, which Proview may be tempted to take, given financial problems and the fact that it isn't actively trying to sell a product with the "IPAD" name.

Proview originally tried to sell a tablet computer in 2000, and registered trademarks for IPAD in regions around the world. Proview Electronics sold Apple a "global trademark" for the name in 2006 at a cost approaching $55,000, but since then Apple and Proview have disputed whether the agreement included China. In 2010 Apple applied to have two Chinese trademarks transferred to its name before it started selling the iPad, but was denied because of Proview Technlogy's ownership, prompting the lawsuit.


By Electronista Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :  

China, lawsuits, iPad, Proview
toggle

Previous Comments

  1. Paulrm

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Not to be confused with...

    Provue, who makes the great Panorama database software!


  1. rjdude

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2009

    +1

    Apple should

    threaten to move all manufacturing out of China.


  1. aduffbrew

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2009

    +1

    Did I miss something?

    I thought Article 44 of Chinese patent law invalidated patents after 3 consecutive years of non-use? Did Proview some how prove they used "iPad" during that time? And how is it that Proview is not held responsible for the actions of its Taiwanese subsidiary? This will be over-turned during the appeal.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

Sponsor

 
toggle

Popular News