Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Law firms claim collusion between Apple, e-book publishers

updated 08:10 pm EST, Tue December 20, 2011

Lawyers want to defend based on insider knowledge

Law firms have motioned this week to represent plaintiffs in class action suits accusing Apple of colluding with publishers. Grant & Eisenhofer claimed to have an insider that revealed "detailed knowledge" in March that gave it reason to pursue the case. A matching filing from another firm also pointed to a source, possibly the same one, that attended an "in-person meeting" with a "very knowledgeable and important confidential source" that was aware of dealings.

The accuracy of the sources isn't confirmed, but if real could potentially condemn Apple, major publishers, and possibly retailers like Amazon. Publicly, the only talk of the alleged price fixing has centered on rumors of an Apple price war with Amazon in the run-up to the iPad launch, where Apple supposedly let publishers have more control over pricing to lure publishers who were hesitant to go beyond Amazon.

Under the accusations, Apple's decision to use this model was combined with "most favored nation" pricing, where other stores outside of the iBookstore weren't allowed to undercut Apple's figures. Publishers then used this term to allegedly strongarm Amazon with the threat that they would pull their books from the Kindle store without a price hike.

Amazon itself hasn't been considered entirely fair to publishers and is known to have sold e-books at a loss to build market share. Apple's move may have created a reverse situation where publishers could pad margins and keep prices high. [via paidContent]



By Electronista Staff
toggle

Comments

  1. adavidw

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2000

    +1

    not "have motioned"

    Should read "Law firms have moved this week". In a legal context, you "move", not "motion". You could say that someone had "made a motion", but that's not really correct, either. You definitely would never say "have motioned".

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    "fair"

    Amazon itself hasn't been considered entirely fair to publishers and is known to have sold e-books at a loss to build market share.

    Selling at a loss is not unfair to publishers, as it is Amazon who eats the loss, not the publisher.

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    hypocrisy

    Of course, no one could actually explain Apple's stance that publishers of music should have no say on the pricing, 99 cents is the perfect price point, but then with books, Amazon's 'perfect price point' is completely unfair and publishers should be given the right to set their own prices!

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Dell AD211 Bluetooth speaker

For all of the high-priced, over-engineered Bluetooth speakers in the electronics market, there is still room for mass-market solution ...

VisionTek 128GB USB Pocket SSD

USB flash drives dealt the death blow to both the floppy and Zip drives. While still faster than either of the old removable media, sp ...

Kodak PixPro SL10 Smart Lens Camera

Smartphone imagery still widely varies. Large Megapixel counts don't make for a good image, and the optics in some devices are lacking ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News