Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Google gets 217 IBM phone, browser patents in defense

updated 01:20 pm EST, Tue January 3, 2012

Google tries to counter patent wars with more IBM

Google has quietly escalated its attempts to mount a defense for Android by getting more IBM patents. An acquisition recorded December 30 gave Google 217 more active and pending patents primarily focused on cellphones, mobile web browsers, and voice search. Among the examples are a patent for a "computer phone," another for a method of resizing websites for mobile, and a third for voice-based keyword searches.

The search firm hasn't discussed the patents so far.

Google has been in a reactionary patent acquisition mode ever since it was outbid in Nortel patents last year. Along with the IBM patents, it bought Motorola for $12.5 billion in a move that was meant primarily to get access to Motorola's roughly 17,000 patents.

All the deals are believed to be attempts to offer a patent defense to Android hardware supporters like Barnes & Noble, HTC, and Samsung. Many of these have been the targets of either Apple lawsuits and trade disputes or else Microsoft's well-known anti-Android patent campaign, which has been counting on most companies agreeing to pay a royalty rather than contest Microsoft in court over the legitimacy of its claims. [via SEO by the Sea]



By Electronista Staff
toggle

Comments

  1. SockRolid

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +4

    17,000 + 217

    Re: "... it bought Motorola for $12.5 billion in a move that was meant primarily to get access to Motorola's roughly 17,000 patents."

    So Google still needed more patents? Is 17,217 patents enough?

  1. wrenchy

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Nov 2009

    -6

    Re: more patents


    >>>Is 17,217 patents enough?

    I don't know. Ask Apple. They seem to think you can never have enough patents.

  1. global.philosopher

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2010

    +11

    Apple creates patent thru innovations

    Google buys patents because they cannot innovate!

  1. charlituna

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2009

    +1

    interesting question

    how many of these patents will end up falling under FRAND rules. That could mess with any plans to deny patents or try to play pricing games.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Cat B100

Cat is primarily known for its heavy-duty machinery used in the construction industry and farming, among other areas. What may not be ...

Linksys EA6900 AC Router

As 802.11ac networking begins to makes its way into more and more devices, you may find yourself considering an upgrade for your home ...

D-Link DIR-510L 802.11AC travel router

Having Internet access in hotels and other similar locations used to be a miasma of connectivity issues. If Wi-Fi was available, it wa ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News