AT&T lights 11 LTE areas, says spectrum gap may hike prices

updated 02:20 pm EST, Thu January 5, 2012

ATT warns it may use spectrum to push prices


AT&T's Business Solutions chief John Stankey at Citi's ongoing media and telecoms conference confirmed that the carrier had switched on LTE-based 4G access in 11 areas over the holidays. New York City's core, San Francisco, San Jose, Austin, Chapel Hill, Los Angeles, Oakland, Orlando, Phoenix, Raleigh, and San Diego all now have the more authentically 4G Internet access. The faster coverage should be finished by the end of 2013, Stankey said.

Alongside the expansion, the executive also repeated the carrier's frequent demands for more wireless spectrum and warned of the consequences should it get worse. Demand was exceeding capacity at the current rate, he said, and pricing could go up or change if AT&T didn't get enough more spectrum.

Stankey didn't say if he thought the buyout of Qualcomm spectrum or the T-Mobile roaming deal would alleviate the crunch and keep prices normative.

Regardless of additions, he claimed that the current habit of having streaming video represent 30 percent of mobile data traffic was "unsustainable" because of the expense. He insisted on a familiar though heavily disputed claim that the top five to ten percent of users make up a disproportionately huge amount of traffic and wanted this to change. Just moving to 4G wouldn't necessarily fix this.

Critics have usually disputed these arguments, noting that both wired and wireless providers often confuse the amount of bandwidth used in a month with the load on the network at any given moment. A heavy user may not be any more demanding than a casual user at the same point in time.

Stankey was direct and relatively unpolitical in explaining the reasons for dropping attempts to take over T-Mobile. Although AT&T thought the $39 billion acquisition would have been the quickest route to solving spectrum problems, it backed off wanting to avoid a protracted fight with the DOJ and FCC. Carriers work in long-term rollouts and consider uncertainty to be "death," he said, and it was better to start working on plans now than to not know whether or not it can go ahead.


By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. Inkling

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2006

    -1

    Start thinking creatively

    Someone with technical expertise should tell these executives to quit whining about spectrum and begin to shrink the size of the cells in their existing cells while adopting creative ideas such as nanocells in business environments and broadcasting (via digital TV stations) for popular data streams.

    I knew this almost thirty years ago when I was doing frequency allocation for a cellular company (McCaw). There's only so much spectrum. They've got to start thinking creatively about how use it and reuse it better.



  1. Drunken Economist

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 2009

    +1

    And yet AT&T airs Commercials where users are...

    ..."Catching the Game" by what? STREAMING VIDEOS.

    AT&T execs are speaking out of two sides of their collective mouths. AGAIN. Remember all those promises of WiMax?

    Plain and simple. It's time to break up AT&T again. They are TOTALLY NOT WORTHY of having any spectrum, or of steering policy for how broadband is used in the USA.

    "Rethink Possible" means 'Suck up to our threats or we raise rates, while selling features (streaming) that we cannot support, even with 3G.

    -Drunky


  1. SockRolid

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +3

    Real 4G is years away

    Re: "...the carrier had switched on LTE-based 4G access in 11 areas over the holidays..."

    Sorry. LTE isn't 4G. Yes, some technologies used in LTE are considered to be "4G technologies." But that's like saying "the wheel is an automotive technology." Correct but misleading.

    What's that? You say that LTE is so much faster that there's no going back to 3G? Well the 4G spec (as defined by the ITU, specifies peak speeds of 100Mbit/sec for high-mobile devices and 1Gbit/sec for low-mobility and stationary devices. LTE isn't anywhere near that in practice.

    And remember: the full name for "LTE" is "3GPP Long Term Evolution."
    The name says it all.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News