Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Hands-on with Nokia's Lumia 900

updated 09:20 pm EST, Tue January 10, 2012

Nokia Lumia 900 tested at CES

We've had the chance to try the Nokia Lumia 900 at CES. The smartphone is in some ways what it looks to be on the surface: an upsized, upgraded version of the Lumia 800. A side-by-side comparison of the Windows Phones shows that they're about as thin, but that the 900 is very clearly wider and taller. If you're not a fan of large phones, you won't be a fan.

We did get a quick chance to test the front camera, which worked well enough. A Nokia representative did caution that prototypes like his didn't have final firmware and weren't producing the final image. The eight-megapixel, f2.2 camera on the back is exactly the same as on the Lumia 800, so we'd expect that it will perform similarly: that is, it can deliver some good shots, but it's not in the iPhone 4S class.

As for the namesake LTE, the irony of getting to test it early at the show is that we couldn't really try it. Even on the relatively untapped 700MHz bands AT&T is using, the sheer amount of wireless traffic combined with overhead insulation made reception spotty. Going outside or going to Las Vegas at any other time would have produced workable results.

The 4.3-inch screen does look good, and unlike on the 800, we couldn't see the "fuzz" of a Pentile AMOLED display. Nokia hasn't said if it has adjusted the display, but it's certainly one of the better-looking screens on any phone right now, at least indoors. The 1.4GHz Snapdragon is the same, too, so it still runs briskly.

Already knowing the OS and much of the hardware, it's safe to say that the Lumia 900 will be the best Windows Phone in the US, maybe even beating the HTC Titan II, through its build quality and the inclusion of major free apps like Nokia Drive. Our main concern is that it may still not necesarily move the needle: there are other big-screened Android phones on AT&T, and the 4.3-inch Samsung Focus S hasn't rocked Apple's iPhone out of the top spot. A major marketing run and word of mouth do give Nokia an edge others don't have.

















By Electronista Staff
toggle

Comments

  1. lamewing

    Dedicated MacNNer

    Joined: Aug 2004

    +1

    Windows 7 Phone...why Nokia why?

    I bought (imported) a Nokia N9 on a whim and wow, I love the thing. I actually sold my iPhone 4 after buying this phone. Don't worry, I bought a new iPod Touch to replace the iPhone. :) The MeeGo interface on the N9 is a dream. Sure there won't be that many apps considering it is a dead product, but I figure it will be fun to use it for a year or two as a "super" feature phone.

    My point? Apple and Google have the market at this point. They make slander one another and jockey for "1st place" in the mobile market, but neither are going anywhere. Windows 7 Phone is a nice OS...I used to own a Samsung Focus, but the apps are limited and the OS doesn't have the appeal of the N9's MeeGo OS. Nokia probably would have been better off selling the MeeGo based phones in the US. I really believe that they could have easily competed against MS for 3rd place here in North America.

    What was my point? Nokia really made a dunderheaded move getting into bed with MS instead of trusting their own product. :/

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

D-Link Wi-Fi Smart Plug

Home automation fans have been getting their fair share of gadgets and accessories in the last few years. Starting with light bulbs an ...

Razer Kraken Pro headset

Gaming headphones are a challenge to get right, for a long list of reasons that are unique to the consumer buying them. Some shoppers ...

Patriot Aero Wireless Mobile Drive

Regardless of how large a tablet you buy, you always want more space. There's always one more movie or another album you'd cram on, if ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News