Windows 8 on ARM to demand Secure Boot, exclude Linux

updated 11:10 am EST, Mon January 16, 2012

Microsoft to insist on Windows 8 only for ARM


Microsoft's Secure Boot feature will be mandatory on ARM-based Windows 8 tablets, according to a discovery in Windows hardware certification documents just found this weekend. While it will be optional on x86, disabling Secure Boot "must not be possible" on ARM. As described, it would prevent any unsigned operating system from running on the resulting hardware, including Linux and variants on it, like Android.

Linux could technically run on these devices if it was signed, but it would also be violating the GPL (GNU Public License), the term needed to be considered an open-source platform. GPL code usually needs to be redistributed, which isn't practical when even the Linux kernel would need to be signed. Every unique variant on Linux would need a code signing from every hardware manufacturer.

Apple and some Android makers also clamp down on running unapproved firmware on their tablets, but unlike Microsoft, they produce their own hardware. The Windows 8 policy would be dictating what third-party hardware makers would be allowed to use.

Microsoft hasn't responded to the latest claims, although there appears to be less ambiguity than there was when concerns originally emerged over Intel tablets.

The decision could create at least some irony for Microsoft, which has often touted the choice and flexibility of Windows PCs as a selling point over Apple. It may also attract antitrust regulators that could interpret the lockout as Microsoft reverting to abusing its desktop monopoly just months after regulator oversight ended to silence Linux and other rival operating systems.

Microsoft could ultimately try to claim that ARM tablets are a different category and point to Windows' expected minority in tablets as proof it's not subject to legal concerns. Former Windows Phone lead Andy Lees may have condemned Microsoft, however, by saying that the company sees tablets as PCs and thus that it's once more trying to silence competition through means other than the quality of its products. [via Computerworld]


By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. rumplestiltskin

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2010

    +7

    Predatory, monopolistic,...

    Maybe if Ballmer did some serious jail time, these practices would stop.
    http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0844878.html


  1. fizzy

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2009

    -1

    well, wait...

    wouldn't Linux, Android etc. still run on another model of similar hardware? Presumable a company could sell an Android and a Win 8 version of the same tablet. This just means that you wouldn't be able to change the OS of your Win 8 tablet, which I'm guessing only about four super-geeks out there want to do anyway.


  1. facebook_Aaron

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Jan 2012

    +5

    Oh yeah...

    I'm sure that will last. I mean, MS security is pretty much known for being air tight.


  1. Roehlstation

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +2

    Hope they release it....

    ....before that trendy interface is no longer hip.


  1. aristotles

    Grizzled Veteran

    Joined: Jul 2004

    -4

    Not a fan of MSFT but.

    If you want an android version then buy one instead. Even Android tablets are usually locked down and require a hack to break the encryption so I don't see the problem here. MSFT is not forcing OEMs to make windows tablets and their are not in the monopoly position in that space.


  1. The Vicar

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2009

    +1

    Tell you what...

    Device makers are complying with Microsoft because Apple is a closed shop and practically nobody WANTS Linux devices. If FOSS advocates want manufacturers to support them, step one is to come up with an ecosystem which is actually useable without being a direct ripoff of closed-source software (which has better compatibility and, usually, a vastly superior interface). Why would anyone want to go to the trouble of installing Linux in order to run (for example) OpenOffice -- which would make the device more of a hassle to use -- when they could run Windows? (And why run Windows when they could run Mac OS X -- these days prices aren't terribly different unless you care nothing for quality.)


  1. DudeMac

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2002

    -1

    I smell class-action lawsuit a brewing

    This is just another way for Microsoft to control the boot loader once again (this time without the use of non-disclosed anti-competitive license agreements with OEMs)!

    http://www.birdhouse.org/beos/byte/30-bootloader/


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News