California to regulate 'vampire' battery chargers

updated 08:00 pm EST, Tue January 17, 2012

Devices waste up to 13 percent of state's power


On Friday, the California Energy Commission issued new guidelines and set energy efficiency standards for battery chargers used to power cellphones, notebooks, power tools, and other devices. The commission hopes to reduce the total energy consumed by chargers, which are typically always left plugged in, even when a device is not being recharged, by 40 percent. Once fully implemented, the new standard could potentially reduce carbon emissions in the state by one million metric tons of carbon emissions and save California residents more than $300 million annually in electricity costs, according to officials.

The Commission estimates that nearly two thirds of the electricity used by battery chargers and battery chargers systems is wasted by inefficiency. There are an estimated 170 million chargers in California households, each with an average of 11 battery chargers. The proposed standards can save nearly 2,200 gigawatt hours of electricity each year, or enough energy to power nearly 350,000 homes, the organization said.

The new standards will be implemented in stages between February 1, 2013 and January 1, 2017. They will apply to chargers for everything from small household items like razors and toothbrushes to cellphones, cameras, notebooks, tablets, and even small electric vehicles like golf carts. Consumer chargers used in cellphones, personal care devices, and power tools will have to meet the new standards by February 2013. Industrial chargers for vehicles such as forklifts will have to comply by January 2014. Compliance for small commercial chargers such as walkie talkies and portable barcode scanners will be required by January 2017.

The standards have the support of both environmentalist groups such as the Natural Resources Defense Council, and power generation companies including Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison.

Some charger makers are opposed. They are concerned that this first in the nation mandate is the beginning of having to meet many diverse individual state requirements as well as federal (Department of Energy) regulations. The concern exists that they might have to redesign twice, once for California and twice for the state, and have made the common threat of passing costs along to customers. [via AP]


By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

    Comment buried. Show
  1. Hillbilly Geek

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2006

    -17

    Oh, goody

    Cali-frick'n-fornia Greenie-sucking government zombies passing more empty-headed, self-pleasuring, self-righteous business-destroying legislation. Wait! I know! they should repeal entropy and gravity for our protection, too!
    *wipes spittle off chin*


    Comment buried. Show
  1. Hillbilly Geek

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2006

    -13

    Outlaw vampire chargers...

    Government hates competition. Just sayin'.


  1. FireWire

    Mac Elite

    Joined: Oct 1999

    +9

    idiots..

    "he concern exists that they might have to redesign twice, once for California and twice for the state"

    why not just produce a "good" version for everyone? "let's waste some power in Oregon, it's still legal there..."

    kudos for Caliornia.. I went there a few years ago and was impressed with their efforts to be very eco-friendly!


  1. Tim_s

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2006

    +4

    Poor Writing

    This article was poorly written. Several sentences were jumbled and very difficult to decipher. Please, hire a proof-reader that has a firm grasp of the english language.

    Besides that, this is one of the few times that I applaud California for their legislation. Maybe if this is done properly, the Dept. of Energy will follow their guidelines and all states will have the same regulations, thus alleviating the fears the manufacturers have of having to meet many regulations.


  1. PJL500

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2011

    +3

    California leads in many ways...

    and bails out every other state in the union by an average of >$1Bn every year (gets $50Bn less back from Fed that it contributes). Go CA.


  1. dimmer

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: Feb 2006

    +2

    And if…

    If the makers of these devices are really concerned with the redesign issues, they should petition the federal government to make the CA specifications national. Seems a much better approach than whimpering about potential "States Rights" concerns and threats to increase prices for consumers.

    Given that the EU has already made the use of standard USB charging for all small electronics, it would make sense to drop that it too. Sure, it's already a moot point for anyone selling product in Europe and the US, but why not?


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News