Printed from

Judge decision could see Android violate key Apple patent

updated 07:05 pm EST, Sun January 29, 2012

HTC may run afoul of patent after decision

An examination of a decision in a Chicago court in Apple's lawsuit versus Motorola could see most any Android device face inherent patent violations. Florian Mueller has noticed that Judge Richard Posner interpreted a realtime API (app programming interface) in such a way that Motorola and other Android supporters not only would be infringing on the technology, but wouldn't have an easy way around it. HTC had already been found violating the patent and could now see that definition enshrined in the courts.

The ruling didn't automatically find companies imitating Apple's patents, but it could have a large bearing on at least the Motorola trial. The case is likely to begin in summer and could very quickly lead to Motorola having to either reach a settlement or risk a ban. With Google's acquisition of Motorola currently under review, Google could find itself inheriting a situation where it directly has to pay for Motorola's actions.

Even in relatively distant cases, like Apple's lawsuits against Samsung, the knowledge of possible patent violations could be used as a bargaining chip.

Neither Apple nor other parties involved have commented on the change in patent circumstances.

By Electronista Staff


  1. SwissMac

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2006


    Irony here

    The irony is that if the patent is enforced, and Android devices have to come off the market, who's going to benefit? Well, it might give a boost to Microsoft and Nokia... in the vacuum of no Android phones on sale.

  1. Feathers

    Grizzled Veteran

    Joined: Oct 1999


    Reach a settlement?

    I don't know how Motorola or Google can extricate themselves by "reaching a settlement" without the participation of Apple who have made it abundantly clear that there will be no settling, there will be no licensing. Apple are not interested in revenue from their IP through its exploitation by others. They want the copycats stopped. Period. Great news BTW!

  1. Bobfozz

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2008


    Music to Jobs' ears and mine

    What is the point of copyright, of patents, if those who have been infringed can not put a stop to the theft. And it seems that from the beginning, that's really what Google was interested in. Ripping off Apple was their ONLY quick way to get involved. Jobs TOLD Schmidt, "I don't want your money!" Apple put years into this, Google what, 6 mos. to a year? MAYBE (but I doubt it), the copycats will learn something from this. I hope Apple ultimate wins.

  1. macnnoel

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2005


    and to think

    Google should have known better. In a way Google committed much bigger atrocity than Samsung alone ever could have.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Dell AD211 Bluetooth speaker

For all of the high-priced, over-engineered Bluetooth speakers in the electronics market, there is still room for mass-market solution ...

VisionTek 128GB USB Pocket SSD

USB flash drives dealt the death blow to both the floppy and Zip drives. While still faster than either of the old removable media, sp ...

Kodak PixPro SL10 Smart Lens Camera

Smartphone imagery still widely varies. Large Megapixel counts don't make for a good image, and the optics in some devices are lacking ...



Most Commented


Popular News