Kindle Fire users get more media, not as happy as iPad users

updated 01:25 pm EST, Thu February 2, 2012

Amazon Kindle Fire habits broken down in study


Amazon Kindle Fire owners get more digital content, but aren't as happy as their iPad-using counterparts, ChangeWave found Thursday. About 29 percent said they would spend more in the next 90 days, a 10-point lead over those who didn't have the Android tablet. Even so, only 54 percent said they were "very satisfied" with the device, or well under the 74 percent of iPad owners who were similarly happy.

Most of the complaints were inherent to the design and couldn't be fixed in software. The absence of a hardware volume rocker was the largest issue, while the absence of any camera was next. Only 10 percent thought the seven-inch screen was too small, however.

As expected, most picked the $199 price as the favorite feature, at 59 percent. The color screen and interface were distant seconds at 31 and 27 percent each, while screen size was again seldom a factor, at just 12 percent.

The survey did indirectly endorse views that the Kindle Fire was more damaging to other Android tablets than to Apple. Its satisfaction rank was higher than the 49 percent average for other tablets, suggesting that the more advanced Android devices were considered too complex or too expensive for the value next to either the Kindle Fire or the iPad.










By Electronista Staff

Other Articles

toggle

Previous Comments

  1. bitwrangler

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2010

    +3

    Not "spend more"

    The article is misleading and doesn't match the graph. It's not that 29% of Fire owners said that they would "spend more", rather, they said that they would "spend more at Amazon". The first graph doesn't mention what, if any, category of products they'd spend more for (e.g. apps vs content vs goods).

    It's not exactly shocking to see that Fire owners are more likely to spend more money at Amazon than non-Fire owners, esp if the "spend more" is fairly broad based. What might be more interesting is to note that the difference between Fire owners and non Fire owners is 10%. My WAG is that Amazon would be hoping for a larger percentage difference considering the loss they are taking on each fire sold.


  1. iphonerulez

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2008

    0

    It does prove one thing...

    That the overwhelming reason for buying the Kindle Fire is the low price proves that it appeals basically to cheapskates. It almost seem to run counter to the assumption that Kindle Fire buyers will spend more money for content. However, Jeff Bezos is widely respected as knowing how to run a profitable business, so maybe there's nothing to worry about. Just because the Amazon financial model doesn't seem to be as sound as Apple's financial model, it doesn't mean it won't be very successful. I clearly don't understand it as being so praiseworthy a financial model but that's probably just me. I constantly use Amazon for purchasing all sorts of things and even if stuff wasn't cheaper, I'd still use it for convenience and good customer support. I trust the service completely since I've been using it for years with absolutely no problems whatsoever.


  1. SockRolid

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +4

    Amazon is all about market share

    From day 1, Amazon has sought market share over all else. That's why their prices are so competitive, and that's why Kindle fire is priced slightly below cost. From a market share perspective it makes perfect sense to lose a little (on hardware alone) selling a lot of Fires for $200 than to sell fewer Fires and make a small profit by selling them at $250 or $300. And as we all know, the Fire is essentially a mobile Amazon sales terminal plus display device for Amazon's digital content.

    Re: "...Kindle Fire was more damaging to other Android tablets than to Apple."

    The Fire now dominates the non-iPad "padlet" market. Exactly what Amazon was going for.


  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -1

    Re: It does prove one thing...

    That the overwhelming reason for buying the Kindle Fire is the low price proves that it appeals basically to cheapskates.

    Yeah, I just love how not wanting to spend $600 on a tablet makes one a 'cheapskate'. Or just by liking the price makes them cheap. Guess what, I'd prefer to spend less than more too. And I'm sure if you polled 100 potential iPad buyers, 85% would say they'd rather spend $300 on an iPad than $600 on an iPad. (The other 15% are the apple-elite who feel that apple stuff should remain expensive so that it doesn't become the kind of things the average joe will have, and, in turn, make themselves feel less special).


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 
toggle

Popular News