Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Apple sues Motorola over alleged Qualcomm patent misuse

updated 04:45 pm EST, Fri February 10, 2012

Apple uses patent exhaustion versus Motorola in US

Apple's lawsuit retaliation continued on Friday after it sued Motorola in the US over 3G patent issues. The iPhone designer sought to block Motorola from making patent violation accusations based on its use of Qualcomm's MDM6610 cellular chipset as well as any others it might use. It came after Qualcomm confirmed to Apple that it was already paying for a license to Motorola's 3G patents, which Apple took to mean that it was exempt from paying itself.

The response jabbed Motorola and claimed that Apple took a different approach to standards. Apple was supposedly more consistent about licensing standards based on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms, and wouldn't try to sue companies or otherwise act out of proportion.

"When Apple makes a promise to license its standards essential patents under FRAND terms, Apple will not waiver," the complaint read. "Apple will keep its commitment and, should it transfer any such patents to a third party, will take best efforts to ensure that the third party adheres to Apple's FRAND obligations. If parties are interested in licensing these patents, Apple will offer to make the patents available on FRAND terms, as long as those terms are reciprocal, and will do so without requiring others to license back to Apple anything more than their similarly held standards essential patents. Apple also commits not to seek an injunction or exclusion order on the basis of its standards essential patents that are subject to a FRAND licensing commitment. Despite owning scores of standards essential patents, Apple has never asserted a standard essential patent in litigation and, therefore -- unlike some in the technology industry -- has never used a patent subject to a FRAND commitment to deny market access to a rival."

Apple characterized the American lawsuit as a direct response to Motorola's lawsuits in Germany and the US, which it saw as Motorola abusing its 3G standards patents. The firm also went into detail on Motorola's attempts to keep its licensing deal with Qualcomm out of the court. Motorola was allegedly breaching its contract with Qualcomm by suing a firm just for using Qualcomm's chips.

The new lawsuit could stand a strong chance of success based on Apple's recent experiences in Europe. Multiple Samsung attempts at preliminary bans in Europe have been shot down with judges often at least partly considering patent exhaustion, or the idea of a limit on who can be charged royalties, as a factor. A US court won't necessarily act on European precedent, but it illustrates a common legal point of view and is being referenced in the US case.

Apple has often been the one to launch patent offensives out of its belief that Android inherently copies iOS. However, many of the countering lawsuits have been based on standards-based patents, and the common pattern has led to an EU investigation of Samsung that could loom over Motorola. A successful verdict in the new Apple lawsuit could effectively shut down Motorola's main counterattack and force it either to focus on defense or to reach for a settlement.

Apple vs. Motorola over Qualcomm patents



By Electronista Staff
toggle

Comments

  1. bigmig

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2004

    +16

    That noise you hear...

    Is the sound of Motorola shareholders laughing all the way to the bank about how much Google was willing to pay for their company.

    Comment buried. Show
  1. Arne_Saknussemm

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Apr 2011

    -22

    APPL=MSFT

  1. MacGeek.

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2011

    +9

    Only..

    android users will say that... APPL=MSFT

    so blinded from the truth.

    Comment buried. Show
  1. wrenchy

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Nov 2009

    -23

    re: That noise you hear...


    Oh bigmig, I wouldn't be so quick to laugh. When the dust settles from all the courtroom shenanigans and Apple and Microsoft have to each pay a $5 per device "Googlerola Tax", we'll see who ends up laughing.

    You may have fired off your pie hole a little too quickly.

    Drroid!

    And if anyone is guilty of patent misuse, it would be those trolls know as Apple.

    Double Drrroid!

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Adesso Xtream S3B Bluetooth speaker

Finding a speaker purpose-built for a specific need is challenging. Even when a Bluetooth speaker can be paired with a mobile device, ...

JBL Synchros E40BT headphones

For all the different configurations of headphones on the market, it's always a tough choice for buyers to get something that is just ...

Razer Taipan mouse

The list of gaming devices is growing larger with each passing day. A large number of companies have entered the gaming input arena, a ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News