Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Apple may pass Intel as world's largest mobile chip producer

updated 09:30 pm EDT, Tue March 20, 2012

ARM, Samsung, Intrisity contribute to success

Two years after buying Texas-based chip maker Intrisity, Apple is poised to become the world's largest mobile device chip provider by the end of 2012, technology research firm In-Stat is claiming. The success is built on the phenomenal popularity of Apple's mobile devices along with selective use of manufacturing partners including ARM and Samsung. Intel is only just now bringing Atom-class processors to mobile devices, reports InfoWorld.

The study done by In-Stat included what are commonly thought of as "mobile" devices, including notebooks, smartphones, tablets, handheld gaming system, e-readers and the iPod Touch. It specifically excludes desktop computers and servers.

Apple was already in second place at the end of 2011, trailing Intel by only five million processors with shipments of 176 million mobile processors compared to Intel's 181 million. This gave Apple a 13.5 percent share of the mobile device market against Intel's 13.9 percent.

It's unlikely that Apple's success in the mobile device field will turn Intel into a rival, however. Intel has long held out the possibility that Apple will eventually switch to its own mobile processors at some point, and is spending heavily on new smartphone, tablet and ultrabook-capable chips to help it capture a place in a market it has been slow to become a presence. Intel hopes to compete against ARM's processors with a low-power Atom chip called Medfield that will be rolled out over the course of the year.

Despite a threat last year to switch away from Intel processors if notebook chips didn't become more energy-conscious, Apple is very reliant on Intel for processors across its growing Mac line, and would be able to move away from them only in the longer term. Intel responded quickly and has since made power conservation a major focus of its work, enabling to begin offering chips suitable for power-sipping portable devices.

Apple currently uses ARM processors as part of its own overall chip design, which are superior to Intel's offerings thus far in their ability to achieve strong performance at low power requirements. Apple incorporates the ARM processors into its own chip designs along with other components, which it then sends to Samsung for manufacturing.

Despite charges and litigation that the tablet division of the Korean company "slavishly copies" Apple's designs and patents, thus far the chip manufacturing side of Samsung has proven to be a good fit for the iPad maker, to the point where Apple is expanding a Texas-based facility used in conjunction with a Samsung factory in Austin, said to be where the next generation of A-series chips will be built.

While Apple is likely to eventually use its own chip designs in other future products, perhaps even Macs themselves, it may not rely on processors from ARM for that side of the business. Intel's new emphasis on strong performance using conservative amounts of power is likely to keep Apple on board with Intel for at least their Mac products, and if Intel can eventually find a way to out-perform ARM on power, it could lead to at least the option of Intel chips in some other products.

Intel may also be trying to fend off a challenge by ARM in the desktop space -- Microsoft has said that Windows 8 will in some form be able to run on either ARM or Intel architecture, and ARM has explored the possibility of producing desktop-quality chips with partners like Qualcomm. There are still driver and compatibility challenges with ARM chips that could use Windows, InfoWorld says, but should MS decide to make a "clean break" with Windows 8 on some products, a lot of the disadvantage of ARM chip use would fade.

Intel is eager to master low-power chips for mobile devices as quickly as possible, both to compensate for falling demand from traditional PC makers for chips as well as be able to offer competition to ARM for both Apple's business and that of other competing tablet makers. The new iPad's record-setting success, to likely be followed by a refreshed iPhone later in the year, makes it seem likely that Apple will take the mobile-processor crown from Intel, at least in the short term. [via InfoWorld]




By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. SockRolid

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +1

    Good luck with that

    Intel's greatest moneymaker, the x86 instruction set and the chips that run it, have become the boat anchor that keeps Intel from progressing in mobile. The Atom CPUs are forced to translate the x86 CISC instructions into "micro ops" (Intel-ese for RISC instructions) for performance reasons.

    Better to do it all in RISC. Like ARM does. Right?

  1. Arne_Saknussemm

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Apr 2011

    -8

    Precisely the kind of tittle -

    that portrays Electronista as a biased, sensationalistic, barely researched source.

  1. SockRolid

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +2

    Here's a crazy idea

    Apple could buy AMD. Its market cap was $5.63 billion at close today, and its future is anything but certain.

    Short-to-medium term: Apple could improve AMD's current chip technology, then use their current (and improved) x86-64 CPUs in Macs. Apple could begin reducing their dependence on Intel. Intel won't like this one bit, but frankly Apple is a boutique vendor. Yes, the PC market is declining, but no Apple isn't a major customer.

    Medium-to-long term: Apple could use AMD's facilities to begin in-house production of ARM-based SoCs for iOS devices. MacBook Air could begin using those ARM-based chips within 5 years, with some careful optimization of OS X.

    Long term: Within 10 years, a single unified OS could run on everything from iPod touch to Apple television set to Mac Pro (plus or minus configuration files, printer drivers, etc.) Or not. Even with separate mobile and legacy OSes, Apple could rid themselves of dependence on a sometimes indifferent CPU provider.

    AMD: $5.63 billion.
    OS X on ARM development: $100 million+ (???)
    In-house CPU design and fab: priceless.

  1. Arne_Saknussemm

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Apr 2011

    0

    Why buy the cow...

    when you can get the steak for much less, and in the case of Apple as many and cooked precisely the way you want them.

    One of the reasons Apple can adapt quickly to changes is precisely because it is good at out sourcing.

    It would acquire AMD just as much as it would Samsung

  1. DaJoNel

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2010

    +4

    Don't look at the name and vote down.

    He has a point. Although it could benefit Apple to buy ARM, having multiple suppliers means competition among them. This leads to more innovation and lower prices. Furthermore, Apple already has a lot of control over these chips, and does not need to exercise any more.

    HOWEVER, if ARM was to suddenly become very unstable and nearly bankrupt, then Apple DEFINITELY should buy them up immediately. Companies near bankruptcy can be purchased at a desperate discount and Apple would certainly lose a lot by having ARM not exist at all.

  1. facebook_Sabrina

    Via Facebook

    Joined: Mar 2012

    0

    Thanks

    Thanks for sharing this info.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Kenu Airframe Plus

Simple, stylish and effective, the Kenu Airframe + portable car mount is the latest addition to Kenu's lineup. Released earlier this y ...

Plantronics Rig Surround 7.1 headset

Trying to capture the true soundscape of video games can be a daunting task. Looking to surround-sound home theater options, users hav ...

Adesso Compagno X Bluetooth keyboard

The shift from typing on physical keyboards to digital versions on smartphones and tablets hasn't been an easy for many consumers. Fro ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News