Printed from

Follow-up: new iPad battery takes 5.5 hours to fully charge

updated 09:30 pm EDT, Mon March 26, 2012

Testing shows bad indicator can cheat users

The bad battery indicator in the new third-generation iPad has been further tested by Dr. Ray Soneira, the president of DisplayMate and the leading scientist testing and explaining the technology behind the new iPad's doubled resolution and advanced "Retina Display" screen, as well as one of the first to uncover that the battery indicator falsely reads "100%" more than an hour before it is actually fully charged. He has since clarified some of his findings.

Soneira found by measuring current draw that the battery indicator showing 100 percent was not at all indicative that the charging process was complete, reaching the point where the iPad stops drawing the full 10 watts of power needed for charging and reduces gradually down before finally reaching a "trickle charge" point of around one watt. If the iPad is on during the charging process, it may need just over two hours (at normal brightness) beyond the point where the indicator reads "100%" to actually fully charge; if off or sleeping, it needs slightly over one extra hour beyond the 100 percent mark.

With the iPad off or sleeping, it now takes 5.5 hours from a complete discharge to fully charged, he says, roughly an hour to 90 minutes more than the previous models of iPad required. With the machine on and the display set to maximum brightness, the recharging process can take up to 20 hours, demonstrating how much power the new display draws. He found that a truly "fully charged" iPad battery operated at normal brightness (medium) and very little activity (no apps, Wi-Fi off, Airplane Mode) was 11.6 hours, exactly in line with conditions specified on the Apple website. Maximum brightness cuts that figure in half, but delivers almost three times as much luminance as the middle brightness setting almost all users would use by default.

The biggest problem, Soneira says, is that customers who simply charge the battery until the indicator reads "100%" are getting cheated of the full runtime of the device. His testing showed that unplugging once 100 percent was indicated reduced the useful running time by 1.2 hours to just 10.4 hours -- still significantly more than Apple's claimed "10 hours running time" but only using conditions that most users would find unproductive (the same ones in the "minimal use" conditions detailed above).

Users who let their machines charge overnight, therefore, would not see any performance drop compared to those who pull the plug based on the faulty software-based battery indicator, which uses a mathematical algorithm rather than a hardware sensor to determine when the battery ought to be full (or drained for that matter).

Soneira says an Apple spokesperson has claimed that owners should not allow the iPad to charge beyond the 100 percent indication lest it "damage the longevity of the battery," but this hasn't been independently verified beyond a single report at CNBC. It would also contradict Apple's previous guidance that its equipment will automatically reduce current draw once the device is fully charged, meaning users can leave their devices plugged in as long as they like. Most iPad (and iPhone, and notebook Mac) owners often allow their devices to recharge overnight.

Soneira says Apple simply needs to fix the software-based algorithm for the new iPad's battery indicator to make it more accurate to how long it takes to charge. Thus far, the company has not issued any formal statement to the general media on the issue.

By Electronista Staff
Post tools:




  1. bjojade

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2007


    Do the math

    The new iPad has 42 Watt Hour battery. Watt hours is a way to measure capacity, meaning if you were drawing 42 watts, the battery would last 1 hour, or if you were drawing 4.2 watts, it would last 10 hours.

    The charger included with the iPad is a 10 watt charger. In order to get 42 watt hours of energy out of the charger, it would need to operate for 4.2 hours. Now, any time you convert energy, it's not 100% efficient. Charging a battery does result in some heat being created, so the estimate of 5.5 hours of charging is very realistic. That's about 80% efficiency, not even considering that the iPad is still drawing some power in the process.

    Comment buried. Show
  1. Thecombinationis12345

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2011


    comment title

    That charge time is still too long.

  1. chas_m




    with "Thecombinationis1" on this. You have to look at how much more "work" the new iPad has to do. This requires a larger battery and thus takes more time to charge. Apple has already done more pioneering work on pushing lithium power cells beyond where they used to go (compare your old MacBook battery's life to the iPad for a quick example) but there's only so much you can cram into that form factor.

    Barring another battery breakthrough (which may well be coming along), getting a roughly same-sized battery to last just as long doing up to four times as much work at a cost of an extra hour of charging? That's a good deal any way you slice it.

  1. driven

    Addicted to MacNN

    Joined: May 2001


    External batteries

    For those long-haul flights: does anyone know of any external batteries fort the 3rd gen iPad? I may need one at some point.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Apple 13-inch MacBook Pro (Early 2015)

Although the new darling of the Apple MacBook line up is the all-new MacBook, Apple has given its popular 13-inch MacBook Pro with Ret ...

Seagate Wireless

It seems like no matter how much internal storage is included today's mobile devices, we, as users, will always find a way to fill the ...

Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 (Android, 10.1-inch)

Lenovo is building a bigger name for itself year after year, including its devices expanding beyond desktop computers. The company's l ...



Most Commented


Popular News