Printed from http://www.electronista.com

ITC says Apple violated one Motorola patent on Wi-Fi

updated 02:00 pm EDT, Tue April 24, 2012

ITC hands Motorola partial win in Apple dispute

Motorola won an at least temporary victory from the International Trade Commission on Tuesday. The agency found (PDF) that Apple had infringed on one of four patents Motorola had leveled, covering a Wi-Fi implementation. As with other ITC disputes, the determination still faces a review that could reverse the decision.

Apple is expected to appeal the ruling if upheld, but didn't have an immediate comment.

The trade dispute side of legal proceedings has worked mostly against Apple so far. It lost its own claim and, with the Motorola win, faces a possible trade or sales ban. Most ITC cases are used to both speed up civil lawsuits, where monetary damages leave a potential payoff, or to force a settlement.

Apple has been facing the prospect of settlements for disputes involving Samsung as well, which could lead to a relatively quick end if neither side insists on an absolute ban.



By Electronista Staff
toggle

Comments

  1. prl99

    Dedicated MacNNer

    Joined: Mar 2009

    +7

    I wish courts would work together

    “A court in Germany has already declared this patent invalid, so we believe we will have a very strong case on appeal,” Kristin Huguet, a Apple spokeswoman, said in a telephone interview, referring to the one patent Apple was found to have violated.

    The patent it was found to have violated covers industry-standard technology and Motorola has refused to license it to Apple on reasonable terms, Huguet said.

    The patent that was found to be infringed covers a way to eliminate noise so signals are clearer.

    (above information from Bloomberg article)

    It would have been nice to have actually given us this kind of information instead of the simplified overview, which doesn't tell us much of anything.

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Re: I wish courts would work together

    Except:
    (a) This isn't a court, it's a trade commission,
    (b) Just because one court ruled the patent invalid doesn't mean it is. That can be overturned just like any other verdict.
    (c) Just because one country doesn't believe in the patent, doesn't mean all countries will follow suit. Patent laws differ by country (for example, a difference in 'first to file' vs. 'first to invent').

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Life n Soul BM211 Bluetooth speaker

Bluetooth speakers aren't only for listening to some music at the park or on a long bus ride, but can also be built with tablets in mi ...

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 2030 projector

With high-definition televisions now the standard, 4K televisions becoming the next big thing, and plasma TVs going the way of the din ...

Life n Soul 8 Driver Bluetooth headphones

When it comes to music on the go, consumers generally have some options to consider when looking for the best experience. While Blueto ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News