Motorola to fight Apple patent on validity, not violation

updated 01:35 pm EDT, Thu April 26, 2012

 

Motorola may concede on key Apple patent dispute


Motorola in a Munich court on Thursday made a partial concession in Apple's lawsuit over touch technology. The RAZR designer's attorney didn't directly contest a view by the presiding judge that Motorola was likely violating a patent for iOS' bounce effect during scrolling. Instead, Motorola hoped to challenge the validity of the patent itself.

The dispute may work in Apple's favor. Although Apple won't have direct recourse to a US court's precedent as binding in Germany, it may still point to court statements in October that Samsung was likely infringing on the patent, supporting that it was valid. Courts in Germany and the US are more likely to deny an initial ban than find a company innocent of a violation, since a preliminary ban is based on perceived urgency rather than absolute legitimacy.

Motorola will see a more definitive hearing for its defense on July 19. If it faces a permanent ban, it may only have to revert to the stock Android interface element, which doesn't move but glows to indicate it's at the end of the list. [via Florian Mueller]


By Electronista Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :  

iPhone, industry, Google, Android, Motorola, mobile phones, Apple
toggle

Previous Comments

  1. hayesk

    Professional Poster

    Joined: Sep 1999

    +5

    Good.

    I think every patent trial should begin with a hearing composed of industry professionals to decide if the patent is indeed valid. The patent office certainly doesn't do their due diligence when granting some of these software patents.


  1. Bobfozz

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2008

    +5

    Why can't these companies ...

    like Motorola, just stay AWAY from what someone else has done and invent their own? In the movies it is called an "homage" which is a cross between fealty and love for what went before, and sheer laziness (sometimes caused by time constraints) to come up with a different idea... which ultimately may be better... but instead of taking a chance, they would rather go to court and see if some attorney can save their bacon, thereby removing "themselves" from the problem.


  1. Stuke

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2005

    +4

    Correct me if I'm wrong...

    ...Motorola's innovations in the past, say, 5 years are... court battles? They being the result of poor product inventions/innovation/delivery to the market and jealously at those who have beaten them in arenas they felt they should have owned. ?? Maybe I'm missing the true aim of Motorola's mission in the attacks on Apple and others. Are they hoping the courts will fix their lateness, laziness, and genuine inability to be inventive for the past 10+ years because they feel they are "owed" it (for once being a powerhouse electronics organization) ?? What are they going to gain, sudden market share dominance ?? Really, what is the point?!


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Logitech FabricSkin Keyboard Folio for iPad

Since the fourth-generation iPad didn't evolve much over its predecessor, the market for iPad accessories has remained somewhat static ...

Huawei Ascend Mate

The Huawei Ascend Mate is a phone that fits the screen-size gap between the 4 to 5-inch smartphone and the seven-inch or more tablet, ...

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Sponsor

 
toggle

Popular News