Apple US government lobbying efforts far behind Google, MS

updated 02:34 am EDT, Thu May 10, 2012

 

Apple 11th place among tech firms


Politico reports that Apple has spent only $500,000 on federal lobbying and associated governmental programs thus far in 2012. By contrast, political action committees (PAC) formed by Google have dropped $5 million, and a separate Microsoft PAC has doled out $1.8 million in the same time period. Sources within Washington suggest that Apple will have a rocky road with DC lawmakers unless they start building a "Washington brand."

The data comes from the freely-available Congressional lobbying disclosure reports, published quarterly on Capitol Hill. Highlights of the report put HP in third place among tech firms with $1.6 million, Oracle with $1.1 million, Amazon at $900.000, and Dell just ahead of Apple at $620,000. Apple has typically not relied on relationships within Washington DC to deal with problems, but rather has taken care of issues internally and quietly.

Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) wrote Apple CEO Tim Cook a public letter asking the company to stop selling a third party application that created fake drivers' licenses. Apple made no public statement regarding the removal following the application's seemingly overnight disappearance from the App Store. More complex problems like e-book price-fixing loom, and won't be so easy to dispatch.

Recent pressure is being applied by politicians and mainstream media using Apple as a target to make a point about fiscal policy. Following a New York Times article about Apple's overseas earnings and legal shields being employed to avoid US taxation, Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) took to Sunday morning television to say "Why should Apple pay at 10 percent and some other company that can’t export their technology, why are they paying 35 percent?" While Coburn's statement was factually incorrect as Apple actually pays 25 percent in taxes, Apple is a common target-- much as Microsoft and Google have been in the past. Microsoft and Google responded to governmental criticism by ramping up lobbyist dollars where Apple appears to prefer a smaller, more focused team.

Jeff Miller served as a senatorial aide on the Judciary Committee's Antritrust committee for the better part of a decade. In regards to Apple's lobbying, he told Politco "I never once had a meeting with anybody representing Apple. There have been other tech companies who chose not to engage in Washington, and for the most part that strategy did not benefit them."

Apple refused to comment on the story. [via Politico]


By Electronista Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :  

government, lobbying, Apple, US Government, Washington
toggle

Previous Comments

  1. SockRolid

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +7

    Amazon: best bang for the buck

    Re: "...Amazon at $900,000..."

    Spend $900k lobbying and the DOJ helps preserve your monopoly on book pricing (especially e-books) and distribution. Your stock P/E ratio rises to 180+.

    Such a deal.


  1. Sukoshi

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2009

    +11

    ...

    Sources within the general public suggest that lawmakers will have a rocky road with the voting public unless they start building a "no laws for money brand."


  1. Geoduck

    Junior Member

    Joined: Jan 2010

    +4

    That means

    that this weekend the New York Times will have an explosive expose about Apple's lobbying campaign to buy Washington influence which will not mention Google, MS, Amazon et.al.


  1. Inkling

    Junior Member

    Joined: Jul 2006

    +3

    Crony Capitalism

    Good for Apple! Like many others, I disgusted by crony capitalism, with corporations lobbying for subsidies and special treatment. Much of the so-called 'stimulus' money went for that and that's one reason our economy is still so morbid.


  1. freddymac

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2010

    +5

    Our Government....

    For sale to the highest bidder......... This whole lobbying thing just makes me SICK.


  1. Grendelmon

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Dec 2007

    +5

    What's that smell?

    Sources within Washington suggest that Apple will have a rocky road with DC lawmakers unless they start building a "Washington brand."

    Start building a DC brand = Congress wants free iPads?


  1. bazaarsoft

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2005

    0

    Odd, that...

    "Sources within Washington suggest that Apple will have a rocky road with DC lawmakers unless they start building a "Washington brand."

    Let's see - Apple is the most successful company in the US at the moment. Guess "Washington brand" isn't that important after all.


  1. Flying Meat

    Junior Member

    Joined: Jan 2007

    +1

    Does anyone still

    wonder why some folks might foster a growing and virulent hatred for "their own" US government?


  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -2

    Re: Amazon: best bang for the buck

    Spend $900k lobbying and the DOJ helps preserve your monopoly on book pricing (especially e-books) and distribution. Your stock P/E ratio rises to 180+.

    What in the world are you talking about? Amazon doesn't have a "monopoly" on book pricing. How in the world do you monopolize pricing, anyway? Could no one else price books? In fact, what did the monopolistic publishers do? They got into a special deal with Apple (and the power and force they bring to the table) in order to force Amazon to change it's pricing model.

    And the DOJ can't force the publishers to give Amazon any particular selling scheme. The publishers made the deal with Amazon. They could just as easily say "No thank you, we'll sell it ourselves".

    There is no difference in what Amazon was doing with pricing of e-books than what apple did with music. In each instance, the producers agreed to the terms. Then, when they realized that they gave away too much power, they went off to try to wrest control back.

    The difference is that, for music, Apple was the one 'in power', so their demands on pricing and such was 'fair', and the industry was 'evil and greedy'. With e-Books, Amazon had the power, so their strategies were evil while Apple's and the industry was fair.

    Amazing how that works: RIAA - greedy b*******; Book Publishers - just trying to make ends meet.

    Of course, up until you decide they're being greedy by charging so much for an ebook vs. a physical one, and then start claiming they're being greedy and Apple should force them to charge less or something.


  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -2

    Semantics

    Apple has typically not relied on relationships within Washington DC to deal with problems, but rather has taken care of issues internally and quietly.

    Oh, so they don't lobby, they just have their lawyers work the backrooms directly.

    And how much has Apple contributed to various campaigns?


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

Sponsor

 
toggle

Popular News