Printed from

Comcast handed victory in adult video 'John Doe' case

updated 10:04 pm EDT, Sat June 23, 2012

Overbroad subpoenas quashed, civil case closed

As previously reported, Internet service provider Comcast attempted to quash "John Doe" subpoenas in an adult video pirating case. The company had argued that the case was about "shaking down" its customers and pushing for settlements out of the 264 potential infringers rather than any interest in actually stopping the piracy. The company has now been handed a victory in court, as Judge Gary Feinerman ruled that Comcast was not in contempt of court for ignoring subpoenas from four adult video companies. The civil case was also dismissed.

The publicly filed court document, seen below, is light on details about the completion of the case. Comcast argued that not only were the subpoenas overbroad in reach, but it imposed an undue burden on any of the accused "John Does" that might try to defend themselves. Federal court rules require discovery be denied "to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense" which a subpoena from Illinois to a defendant in Florida would entail.

Besides the procedural issues set forth, Comcast lawyers saw the motivation behind the claims as not being about rights protection, but about blackmail and threats. From the court filing: "The plaintiffs have no interest in actually litigating their claims against the Doe defendants, but simply seek to use the Court and its subpoena powers to obtain sufficient information to shake down the Doe defendants."

No appeal has been filed at this time. The parent company of the adult film companies have filed 118 cases over 15,000 "John Does" in the past, with 34 in the Illinois courtroom alone.


By Electronista Staff
Post tools:




  1. Makosuke

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001



    Wow, Comcast actually standing up and doing something for its users rather than against them? Up is down, and left is right.

    It'd be nice if they also took that much of a stand against non-adult media conglomerates, which are just as much jerks but have much deeper pockets and far more political pull. But, hey, small victories when you can get them.

    And by the way, I'm not defending media pirates--they're jerks, too. But that doesn't give you the right to spam lawsuits at random, either.

  1. phillymjs

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2000


    Standing up for its users? Ha!

    I think their angle was more like, "Nobody gets to shake down our customers but us!"

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Seagate Wireless

It seems like no matter how much internal storage is included today's mobile devices, we, as users, will always find a way to fill the ...

Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 (Android, 10.1-inch)

Lenovo is building a bigger name for itself year after year, including its devices expanding beyond desktop computers. The company's l ...

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, the process is not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often t ...



Most Commented


Popular News