Judge blocks Apple, Samsung requests to keep docs private

updated 10:01 am EDT, Wed July 18, 2012

 

Parties have one week to refile


US District Judge Lucy Koh has denied several requests by Apple and Samsung to keep some documents secret in the companies' upcoming trial, scheduled for July 30th, Reuters reports. In her ruling, Koh states that "it appears that the parties have overdesignated confidential documents and are seeking to seal information that is not truly sealable." Nevertheless, both parties have a week to refile their requests.

Apple and Samsung are likely attempting to keep patents and/or other trade secrets from being exposed to competitors, but Koh's order may stem from a belief that the companies have gone too far. In her response, she comments that "only documents of exceptionally sensitive information that truly deserve protection will be allowed to be redacted or kept from the public." Koh has been a controversial judge however, as some have argued that granting preliminary injunctions against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 and Galaxy Nexus was improper. Samsung is appealing both actions.

Notably, Reuters itself is responsible for filing a motion on Tuesday looking to oppose Apple and Samsung's censorship. If some documents are kept under wraps, it may be difficult for news agencies to find many details to report until the trial comes to a conclusion.


By Electronista Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :  

patents, industry, Samsung, lawsuits, Apple
toggle

Comments

  1. And.reg

    Senior User

    Joined: 02-22-04

    Greetings. I am unable to delete my posts, and apparently you moderators are on some kind of a strike.

    Therefore, I have removed the content of the original post by hand.

    I am asking for this post to be deleted, since I don't seem to have the option to do that myself.

  1. bleee

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: 03-28-02

    Sharing ideas doesn't equate to making the most money. You're thinking like a consumer not a corporation.

  1. And.reg

    Senior User

    Joined: 02-22-04

    Greetings. I am unable to delete my posts, and apparently you moderators are on some kind of a strike.

    Therefore, I have removed the content of the original post by hand.

    I am asking for this post to be deleted, since I don't seem to have the option to do that myself.

  1. jmonty12

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 06-02-03

    These aren't' people, they're corporations. But anyway, court proceedings are meant to be public for a reason -- to make sure justice has been served in a verifiable way. So unless the release of information will truly harm one of the litigants then the information should be publicly available.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

Sponsor

 
toggle

Popular News