Printed from http://www.electronista.com

SHIELD Act may force patent trolls to pay legal bills

updated 02:21 am EDT, Thu August 2, 2012

Bill may give wide discretion to judges to charge NPEs

A new bipartisan bill introduced by Rep Peter DeFazio (D-OR) in the US House of Representatives seeks to curb frivolous patent litigation by forcing unsuccessful claimants to cover the defendant's legal fees. The Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes (SHIELD) Act could force any plaintiff who is found in court to not have a "reasonable likelihood" (as determined by the judge or jury) of winning the case to pay the opponent's legal fees if the bill passes.

The SHIELD act defines the term "software patent" for the first time, in anything other than generic terms. A software patent is defined as a patent covering "any process that could be implemented in a computer regardless of whether a computer is specifically mentioned in the patent" as well as the hardware required to run the process.

While the term "software patent" is finally defined in the bill for legal purposes, the SHIELD act text is careful to not declare it a specific legal entity or endorse the existence of software patents in any way. The bill contains a clause that it should not be construed as "amending or interpreting categories of patent-eligible subject matter."

Julie Samuels, an attorney on the Electronic Frontier Foundation's payroll supports the bill. She says that the EFF supports "policies and legislation that treat software differently. Fee shifting would empower innovators to fight back, while discouraging trolls from threatening lawsuits to start."

The SHIELD act comes in the wake of a brief governmental discussion of patent licensing, as well as a high-profile court ruling decrying software patents. Boston University researchers estimatedin the end of 2011 that patent trolls have cost US companies in excess of $500 billion since 1990.


Shield Act



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. macnnoel

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 02-26-05

    It's about time!

  1. wrenchy

    Forum Regular

    Joined: 11-03-09

    Apple won't be liking this bill.

  1. Spheric Harlot

    Clinically Insane

    Joined: 11-07-99

    On the contrary: Apple will LOVE this.

    It will protect them from all those lawsuits from patent collectors who have no interest in the patents at all, other than to use them to extort money from companies that need to use them.

    Apple will continue to pursue the protection of their corporate patents, to try and maintain their competitive advantage. It will just cost them more to do so in the cases where they lose, if they ever do.

    It may increase the likelihood of settlements out of court.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Sound Blaster Roar Bluetooth speaker

There could very well be a new king of the hill for Bluetooth speakers, with Sound Blaster's recent entry into the marketplace. Bringi ...

Kenu Airframe Plus

Simple, stylish and effective, the Kenu Airframe + portable car mount is the latest addition to Kenu's lineup. Released earlier this y ...

Plantronics Rig Surround 7.1 headset

Trying to capture the true soundscape of video games can be a daunting task. Looking to surround-sound home theater options, users hav ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News