Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Controversy emerges over Samsung expert on ITC case

updated 11:32 am EST, Thu February 28, 2013

Expert previously criticized Apple in pro-Samsung UK ruling

Controversy has emerged over a new expert on an Ericsson v. Samsung case at the US International Trade Commission, according to reports. Complaints began when FOSS Patents discovered that the Rt. Hon. Professor Sir Robin Jacob has been brought onto Samsung's side in the ITC dispute. Jacob, significantly, was one of the UK judges who ruled that Apple was non-compliant in publishing a required admission that Samsung hadn't violated Apple's iPad patents.

While the judge may not have violated any laws, it has raised concerns over conflict of interest. Samsung tells the International Business Times that Jacob isn't a legal representative for Samsung, but has been contracted as an expert by a lawfirm representing Samsung at the ITC.

Ericsson is accusing Samsung of patent infringement and asking the ITC for bans on several Samsung devices. Among these are the Galaxy S III, the Galaxy Note II, and the Galaxy Tab.



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. drumrobot

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 10-22-09

    "Controversy"?

    I wouldn't call it a "controversy." Some websites reported it, but it's really not a full-blown controversy. Mueller himself stated that he did not think anything illegal had happened.

  1. James Katt

    Junior Member

    Joined: 03-02-08

    Conflict of Interest

    It is a conflict of interest. It does call into mind if the judge was BIASED when ruling against Apple, realizing he could be hired by Samsung if he did so.

  1. Charles Martin

    MacNN Editor

    Joined: 08-04-01

    Maybe I've been living under a rock, but since when do supposedly impartial judges still on the bench get to take side jobs where they must, for money, take positions that will inevitably bring them into conflict with future decisions?

  1. Spheric Harlot

    Clinically Insane

    Joined: 11-07-99

    Originally Posted by chas_mView Post

    Maybe I've been living under a rock, but since when do supposedly impartial judges still on the bench get to take side jobs where they must, for money, take positions that will inevitably bring them into conflict with future decisions?



    That makes no sense.

    This judge was arguably a legal expert on patents, and as such, he is valuable to Samsung and got hired by them four months after the relevant judgment.

    If it is deemed there might be a conflict of interest for certain future court cases, then he won't be assigned to those court cases.

    The fact that he has taken on a specific side job does not per se make him unfit for the job as a judge. If that were the case, no judge would be able to take any side job, ever, as there is bound to be some court case eventually that would be relevantly affected by the side interest.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Advertisement

Recent Reviews

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, it's not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often touted as f ...

Moshi iVisor AG and XT for iPad Air 2

Have you ever tried to put in a screen protector that relies on static to cling to the screen? How many bubbles and wrinkles does it h ...

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500 projector

Trying to find the perfect projector for a home theater can be tricky, as there are bountiful options on the market from a large numbe ...

Advertisement

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News