Exclusive Deal While supplies last, save 40% off over 40 iPhone 5 and iPhone 4/4S cases and chargers as well as Samsung S III cases at Kensington.com. Use coupon code 'SAVE40%' at checkout to receive this exclusive discount.      

UK court rules Apple isn't violating Samsung 3G patent

updated 09:40 am EST, Thu March 7, 2013

 

Legal tide so far in Apple's favor


A judge in a London court has ruled against a Samsung claim that Apple is violating a standards-essential 3G data patent. "We are disappointed by the court's decision," says a Samsung spokeswoman in an official statement. "Upon a thorough review of the judgment, we will decide whether to file an appeal. For decades, we have heavily invested in pioneering the development of technological innovations in the mobile industry, which have been constantly reflected in our products."

Samsung has been looking to claim royalties of nearly 2.5 percent on 3G-capable Apple devices, but has been regularly defeated in the claims it has pursued. The company has so far lost 25 assertions on standards-essential patents and only won three -- two of them in its home country of South Korea. Apple and Samsung are pursuing a number of lawsuits against each other worldwide; aside from the UK and Korea, cases have reached courts in the US, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the Netherlands.


By Electronista Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :  

iPhone, patents, industry, UK, Samsung, lawsuits, mobile phones, Apple, iPad
toggle

Comments

  1. The Vicar

    Junior Member

    Joined: 07-01-09

    Yeah, sure.

    "For decades, we have heavily invested in pioneering the development of technological innovations in the mobile industry, which have been constantly reflected in our products."

    Not spoken: "or at least, we used to, but we stopped sometime around 2000. That's why we only release ripoffs of Apple's products these days, rather than anything original."

  1. shawnde

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 04-01-08

    The question is ....

    Will the judge force Samsung to put a prominent ad in the UK papers, admitting that Apple hadn't copied their "innovations" ??? They requested Apple to do it for Samsung; why wouldn't go the other way? ..... oh yeah ... I read somewhere that Samsung had bought the UK justices !!! I wonder for how much?

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

Sponsor

 
toggle

Popular News