Printed from

US FDA begins investigating smartphone medical apps

updated 02:30 pm EDT, Fri May 24, 2013

Crackdown begins with diabetic urine analysis app

The US Food and Drug administration has begun investigating an iOS medical app available on the App Store to find out why it wasn't pre-approved by the agency and has begun the process of setting up guidelines for apps that make health- and medical-related claims. Currently, the agency only closely regulates some specific apps tied to medical hardware that would have dire consequences if they didn't work as advertised.

The app in question, uChek by Biosense Technologies ($40), allows users to check levels of blood, protein or other substances in their urine using test strips and the iPhone camera to record and analyze the results. The app is used mostly by diabetic patients for self-monitoring.

In its letter to the company that makes the app, the FDA pointed out that the test strips the application uses weren't approved for automated analysis and thus can't be assured of giving correct readings. The agency is planning to adopt stricter rules, such as requiring FDA approval, on apps that directly diagnose or treat conditions.

The letter warns that Biosense may need to obtain agency clearance for the entire system, including the strips: "Please note that though the types of urinalysis dipsticks you reference for use with your application are cleared, they are only cleared when interpreted by direct visual reading," the letter says. "Since your app allows a mobile phone to analyze the dipsticks, the phone and device as a whole functions as an automated strip reader."

"When these dipsticks are read by an automated strip reader, the dipsticks require new clearance as part of the test system.  Therefore, any company intending to promote their device for use in analyzing, reading, and/or interpreting these dipsticks need to obtain clearance for the entire urinalysis test system (i.e., the strip reader and the test strips, as used together)."

For its part, Biosense replied with a statement saying it intended to "work very closely with the US FDA over the coming months to ensure that we continue to deliver accurate, affordable and convenient diagnostics across the world." The CEO of the India-based company said that it received the FDA letter on Wednesday, but did not say if the strip makers, Bayer and Siemens, had received similar letters. Inquiries to both companies on whether they had gotten letters were not immediately answered.

The FDA has indicated that it is seeking at least a 510(k) application for the app in preparation for a formal approval. The 510(k) doesn't require clinical trials as long as the applicant can prove its product is similar to an already-approved product.

The FDA originally proposed in 2011 that diagnostic medical apps should have the same standards applied to them as mechanical medical devices such as ultrasound machines and heart stents. Depending on how cooperative the company is, the FDA may have to issue a further letter outlining possible legal violations and requesting that the company remove the app until the FDA gives its approval.

By Electronista Staff
Post tools:




  1. jslewis

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 05-26-13

    If you think the IRS has lost its mind, I can assure you that the lack of accountability, hubris, and repressive mindset of the FDA exceeds anything you can imagine. As a physician and a geek I can assure you that the IRS has stymied medicine for years. I routinely buy brand new "FDA approved devices" running only Windows XP. Some run under Windows 98, Windows 2000, and occasionally Vista. Forget about OS X.

    A perfect example is Osirix who's FDA "approved" version costs $599 while the non-FDA approved version is $399. Making matters worse, a minimally slower version is free! I have been using the free version for years.

    Making matters worse software must be run on systems where the operating system is "frozen", no updates, no concurred programs, no internet connectivity, etc. Patients with OCD can be treated, branches of government with OCD keep us 15 years behind Europe, Japan, Australia, and Canada.

    They want to proved the "correctness" of software so clearly they have not read Edsger W. Dijkstra. It is illegal to upgrade software or firmware making the practice of medicine in the US a third world task. The bureaucracy they have constructed with the mandated EHR is byzantine.

    Democrats, Republicans and Independence and even Anarchist should unite against this.


Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, it's not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often touted as f ...

Moshi iVisor AG and XT for iPad Air 2

Have you ever tried to put in a screen protector that relies on static to cling to the screen? How many bubbles and wrinkles does it h ...

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500 projector

Trying to find the perfect projector for a home theater can be tricky, as there are bountiful options on the market from a large numbe ...



Most Commented


Popular News