Printed from http://www.electronista.com

USPTO validates important aspects of Apple 'rubber-banding' patent

updated 04:42 pm EDT, Thu June 13, 2013

Should provide ammunition in cases against Samsung

Apple has told US District Judge Lucy Koh that the US Patent and Trademark Office is issuing a reexamination certificate, confirming four primary claims in the company's so-called "rubber-banding" patent, according to FOSS Patents. The patent describes the way iOS reacts whenever a user hits the bottom of a scrollable element. The USPTO once tentatively rejected claims in the patent, but Apple urged a court overseeing one of the company's lawsuits against Samsung to wait. Claim 19 in the patent helped Apple successfully sue Samsung for patent infringement last year.

It's believed that the certificate could give Apple an advantage when dealing with other patents it's asserting against Samsung. In the US, Apple is still dealing the aftermath of the 2012 lawsuit, an ongoing second, and a complaint at the International Trade Commission.



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. bobolicious

    Dedicated MacNNer

    Joined: 08-15-02

    ...perhaps macnn might be improved by having a separate legal news site, for all those interested in the behind the scenes 'news'...?

    MacLegalista? MacLegalNN? MacCopyCatNN?

  1. Charles Martin

    MacNN Editor

    Joined: 08-04-01

    It's true we have guaranteed another four years (at least) of material ... :)

  1. coffeetime

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: 11-15-06

    How about MaCourtista?

  1. Mike Wuerthele

    Managing Editor

    Joined: 07-19-12

    That's an interesting question, though. Court cases. How much attention to regular site readers pay to the articles devoted to them? The whole case? Just the verdict?

    There's actually a lot of material in between the start and finish we don't cover.

  1. Sukoshi

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 08-19-09

    If I make an extra hard drag on the muscles in my eyeballs I can skip right over a story I'm not interested in. This is *Mac*NN and until they change the first three letters I don't see why a story that's related to the company that makes Macs isn't worthy of the unlimited space available to this website. A lot of technical websites cover items that are connected to the companies they talk about by only a thin thread, yet it still interesting. What's funny is that you think somehow that this website is wasting your time, so you coming in and wasting a bunch of time to talk about how you don't want to read a story, when you could've just skipped it. Thank you for printing this article.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Kenu Airframe Plus

Simple, stylish and effective, the Kenu Airframe + portable car mount is the latest addition to Kenu's lineup. Released earlier this y ...

Plantronics Rig Surround 7.1 headset

Trying to capture the true soundscape of video games can be a daunting task. Looking to surround-sound home theater options, users hav ...

Adesso Compagno X Bluetooth keyboard

The shift from typing on physical keyboards to digital versions on smartphones and tablets hasn't been an easy for many consumers. Fro ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News