Printed from http://www.electronista.com

USPTO issues 'final' rejection of Apple's pinch-to-zoom patent

updated 01:54 pm EDT, Mon July 29, 2013

Apple forced to appeal rejection

The US Patent and Trademark Office has reportedly moved to finalize its rejection of Apple's pinch-to-zoom patent, which has been asserted in several high-profile lawsuits. Working to gain an advantage in its first of several lawsuits with Apple, Samsung is said to have notified the court of the agency's decision to reject all claims of the patent (No. 7,844,915) that describes APIs for scrolling operations.

As noted by patent blogger Florian Mueller, Apple's attorneys have argued that Samsung's alleged infringement of the pinch-to-zoom patent has been the most damaging violation of its multitouch patents. The first lawsuit also covers other intellectual property, however, with much higher damage claims relating to design patents rather than software.

The USPTO action is reportedly one of several steps toward an actual finalized rejection, leaving Apple several opportunities to appeal the decision and attempt to uphold the validity of various patent claims. Samsung is pushing for a delay in the legal process while the patent office continues its rejection process, however Apple argues that the appeals process could extend into 2017.

The agency previously rejected and subsequently reaffirmed a separate Apple patent, known as the rubber-banding patent, which was also asserted in the infringement suit. The litigation resulted in a billion-dollar judgement against the Korean company, which has asked the court to begin an entirely new trial.



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. pairof9s

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: 01-03-08

    At least in technology, patent protection seems toothless when it finally runs the gamut of legal processes. Affected products long past their shelf life thus minimizing the damages to guilty companies once a final verdict is administered.

  1. shawnde

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 04-01-08

    Indeed ... the system is perfectly tuned for patent trolls .... who not only succeed wildly by basically milking "small" millions from big tech companies, but it also promotes the idea of "copy now, litigate later", which effectively gets them off the hook, since neither the USPTO nor the US legal system is setup to enforce any of it.

    It's no wonder why companies like Samsung, Motorola, LG, Google, Microsoft and others never even blink when they want to rip someone off ... they just do it, and pass on the liability to the legal department, who's more than happy to file for endless appeals. In the 10 year span of successive appeals, it's all a moot point anyway. But the lawyers and judges have stuffed their pockets (and so did the USPTO).

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Logitech Hyperion Fury mouse

Selecting the correct gaming mouse comes down to finding a device that balances the needs of a user with a price they can afford. Ofte ...

Life n Soul BM211 Bluetooth speaker

Bluetooth speakers aren't only for listening to some music at the park or on a long bus ride, but can also be built with tablets in mi ...

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 2030 projector

With high-definition televisions now the standard, 4K televisions becoming the next big thing, and plasma TVs going the way of the din ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News