Printed from http://www.electronista.com

DEA pays AT&T to provide phone records back to 1987

updated 02:37 pm EDT, Mon September 2, 2013

Records extend beyond AT&T customers

The Drug Enforcement Agency and other government agencies have reportedly paid AT&T for access to a database of phone records extending back to 1987, according to a New York Times report. Referred to as the "Hemisphere Project," the program is said to store data regarding phone calls routed through AT&T switches, rather than focusing solely on records for AT&T customers.

AT&T employees are reportedly placed alongside DEA agents and other law-enforcement officials in a number of units across the country, helping to find records relevant to ongoing investigations. Agencies have been known to subpoena such records, however this is the first time the government has acknowledged the depth of the records and a deeper collaborative effort with a private company.

The disclosure has been compared to recent leaks surrounding the National Security Agency's phone-records database, which is claimed to only go back four years. The AT&T records are further said to include additional information, such as the location of callers.

"All requestors are instructed to never refer to Hemisphere in any official document," a presentation slide obtained by the New York Times reads.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Fallon dismissed the significance of the findings, claiming that "subpoenaing drug dealers' phone records is a bread-and-butter tactic in the course of criminal investigations" and Hemisphere simply "streamlines the process."

It remains unclear if the government has similar programs in place with other major US carriers, such as Sprint and Verizon.



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. reader50

    Administrator

    Joined: 06-01-00

    I object. We created those records, one private phone call at a time. Not AT&T. Shouldn't the government be paying us for those records?

    This is like sellers of pirated DVDs - the party who doesn't own the records is making a profit off them. We should sue for copyright infringement and wrongful enrichment.

    It is such a privilege to know they've kept our records for 26 years so far. Perhaps they were going to purge the records after another 26 years to protect our privacy.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Advertisement

Recent Reviews

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, it's not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often touted as f ...

Moshi iVisor AG and XT for iPad Air 2

Have you ever tried to put in a screen protector that relies on static to cling to the screen? How many bubbles and wrinkles does it h ...

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500 projector

Trying to find the perfect projector for a home theater can be tricky, as there are bountiful options on the market from a large numbe ...

Advertisement

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News