Printed from http://www.electronista.com

DEA pays AT&T to provide phone records back to 1987

updated 02:37 pm EDT, Mon September 2, 2013

Records extend beyond AT&T customers

The Drug Enforcement Agency and other government agencies have reportedly paid AT&T for access to a database of phone records extending back to 1987, according to a New York Times report. Referred to as the "Hemisphere Project," the program is said to store data regarding phone calls routed through AT&T switches, rather than focusing solely on records for AT&T customers.

AT&T employees are reportedly placed alongside DEA agents and other law-enforcement officials in a number of units across the country, helping to find records relevant to ongoing investigations. Agencies have been known to subpoena such records, however this is the first time the government has acknowledged the depth of the records and a deeper collaborative effort with a private company.

The disclosure has been compared to recent leaks surrounding the National Security Agency's phone-records database, which is claimed to only go back four years. The AT&T records are further said to include additional information, such as the location of callers.

"All requestors are instructed to never refer to Hemisphere in any official document," a presentation slide obtained by the New York Times reads.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Fallon dismissed the significance of the findings, claiming that "subpoenaing drug dealers' phone records is a bread-and-butter tactic in the course of criminal investigations" and Hemisphere simply "streamlines the process."

It remains unclear if the government has similar programs in place with other major US carriers, such as Sprint and Verizon.



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. reader50

    Administrator

    Joined: 06-01-00

    I object. We created those records, one private phone call at a time. Not AT&T. Shouldn't the government be paying us for those records?

    This is like sellers of pirated DVDs - the party who doesn't own the records is making a profit off them. We should sue for copyright infringement and wrongful enrichment.

    It is such a privilege to know they've kept our records for 26 years so far. Perhaps they were going to purge the records after another 26 years to protect our privacy.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Asus Chromebook C300

When Chromebooks hit the market back in 2011, consumers didn't know what to do with them. The low-cost laptops, powered by Google's Ch ...

Plantronics BackBeat Pro Bluetooth headphones

Looking for a pair of headphones that can do everything a user requires is a task that can take some study. Trying to decide on in-ear ...

Lemur BlueDriver

"Oh no, the check engine light is on…again! What one of the hundreds of reasons could it be this time? Probably going to cost a fort ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News