Printed from http://www.electronista.com

DEA pays AT&T to provide phone records back to 1987

updated 02:37 pm EDT, Mon September 2, 2013

Records extend beyond AT&T customers

The Drug Enforcement Agency and other government agencies have reportedly paid AT&T for access to a database of phone records extending back to 1987, according to a New York Times report. Referred to as the "Hemisphere Project," the program is said to store data regarding phone calls routed through AT&T switches, rather than focusing solely on records for AT&T customers.

AT&T employees are reportedly placed alongside DEA agents and other law-enforcement officials in a number of units across the country, helping to find records relevant to ongoing investigations. Agencies have been known to subpoena such records, however this is the first time the government has acknowledged the depth of the records and a deeper collaborative effort with a private company.

The disclosure has been compared to recent leaks surrounding the National Security Agency's phone-records database, which is claimed to only go back four years. The AT&T records are further said to include additional information, such as the location of callers.

"All requestors are instructed to never refer to Hemisphere in any official document," a presentation slide obtained by the New York Times reads.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Fallon dismissed the significance of the findings, claiming that "subpoenaing drug dealers' phone records is a bread-and-butter tactic in the course of criminal investigations" and Hemisphere simply "streamlines the process."

It remains unclear if the government has similar programs in place with other major US carriers, such as Sprint and Verizon.



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. reader50

    Administrator

    Joined: 06-01-00

    I object. We created those records, one private phone call at a time. Not AT&T. Shouldn't the government be paying us for those records?

    This is like sellers of pirated DVDs - the party who doesn't own the records is making a profit off them. We should sue for copyright infringement and wrongful enrichment.

    It is such a privilege to know they've kept our records for 26 years so far. Perhaps they were going to purge the records after another 26 years to protect our privacy.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Cat B100

Cat is primarily known for its heavy-duty machinery used in the construction industry and farming, among other areas. What may not be ...

Linksys EA6900 AC Router

As 802.11ac networking begins to makes its way into more and more devices, you may find yourself considering an upgrade for your home ...

D-Link DIR-510L 802.11AC travel router

Having Internet access in hotels and other similar locations used to be a miasma of connectivity issues. If Wi-Fi was available, it wa ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News