Printed from http://www.electronista.com

USPTO confirms all claims in key 'Steve Jobs' iPhone patent

updated 11:27 am EDT, Thu October 17, 2013

Re-establishes foothold for Apple lawsuits

The US Patent and Trademark Office has finished a re-examination of Apple's so-called "Steve Jobs patent" and upheld all 20 claims as patentable, reports note. The patent is 364 pages in length, and covers many of the core concepts of the iPhone. Last year it was challenged anonymously, however, and in December the USPTO issued a preliminary invalidation.

The re-examination certificate was quietly issued to Apple on September 4th. The decision should give Apple a more solid legal standing in lawsuits. It's not clear who made the anonymous challenge, but it's speculated to be Samsung and/or Google, both of whom have been the main targets of Apple legal attacks over Android. Jobs famously accused Android of being "stolen," and threatened to go to "thermonuclear war" over his beliefs.



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. Sebastien

    Registered User

    Joined: 04-29-00

    Yeah, "stolen" - just like Apple stole the designs of Konfabulator.

  1. BLAZE_MkIV

    Professional Poster

    Joined: 02-23-00

    That would be true if Konfabulator was actualy an original idea and not something that existed since the first days of window based GUIs

  1. Sebastien

    Registered User

    Joined: 04-29-00

    I said "stole (copied) the design of" - not "the idea of". #learnToRead

  1. Flying Meat

    Dedicated MacNNer

    Joined: 01-25-07

    Of course there is the other perspective:
    http://daringfireball.net/2004/06/dashboard_vs_konfabulator

    I don't know if Apple had any communications with the Konfabulator developer regarding acquisition, or forwarning, but of course they weren't obliged to, as similar functionality existed even before Konfabulator, in one form or another in Apple's various OSs.

    But the patent items at the center of the article are valid, and have to be defended. Unarguably, no smart phone had the functionality described in the patent previous to the iPhone, which Apple patented successfully. Then Google et al decided to handle those patented features as if they were standards essential or prior art or whatever justification they thought they could get away with...

  1. BLAZE_MkIV

    Professional Poster

    Joined: 02-23-00

    Originally Posted by SebastienView Post

    I said "stole (copied) the design of" - not "the idea of". #learnToRead



    To bad you can't copy-write or patent a design huh? Oh wait they did that intentionally didn't they.

  1. Spheric Harlot

    Clinically Insane

    Joined: 11-07-99

    Don't feed the troll.

  1. aristotles

    Grizzled Veteran

    Joined: 07-16-04

    The main designer of Konfabulator worked at Apple on the Copland project see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copland_%28operating_system%29 which featured widgets and themes. Not only did he steal the widget idea from his former employer but also the ideas for a theme engine which was released as Kaleidoscope.

    I would not be surprised if he had "borrowed" some of the code too.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Dell AD211 Bluetooth speaker

For all of the high-priced, over-engineered Bluetooth speakers in the electronics market, there is still room for mass-market solution ...

VisionTek 128GB USB Pocket SSD

USB flash drives dealt the death blow to both the floppy and Zip drives. While still faster than either of the old removable media, sp ...

Kodak PixPro SL10 Smart Lens Camera

Smartphone imagery still widely varies. Large Megapixel counts don't make for a good image, and the optics in some devices are lacking ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News