Printed from

Samsung files motion to stop damages retrial based on USPTO comment

updated 03:49 pm EST, Wed November 20, 2013

Previously attempted Samsung tactic tried again as USPTO hearings continue

In a last-ditch effort to stop the jury deliberation of the now concluded Apple versus Samsung damages retrial, Samsung has made an emergency filing based on a comment from the US Patent and Trademark Office, which said that an Apple patent may not be valid. According to the filing, the USPTO questions if Apple's "pinch to zoom" patent, a key patent used in the retrial, is valid. Samsung believes that "this PTO decision calls into question the entire jury verdict in this trial."

The declaration by the USPTO requires Apple to file more documentation and argue for the validity of the patent - a process which it has done successfully several times in other cases. Despite Samsung's claim that this is a "decision" by the USPTO, it is in fact part of a long and often-reversed process - and neglected to mention that it or its allies (such as Google) may have been behind the challenge to the patent's validity.

Even though the '915 patent is still considered valie until finally overturned by the USPTO and all legal challenges afterwards exhaused, Samsung claims that "during its presentation, Apple made a deliberate decision not to separate the damages between the different asserted patents. Therefore, it will be impossible to determine what allocation of damages belong to the invalid '915 patent versus the other patents."

The presiding judge, Judge Lucy Koh, has previously denied a similar request following other USPTO actions on the same patent, and said at that time that Samsung could re-issue requests if the USPTO did ultimately invalidate the patent. Final invalidation is still at least 18 months away, with another 18 months at a minimum of legal challenges by Apple. Judge Koh has not yet ruled on the new request.

By Electronista Staff


  1. pairof9s

    Senior User

    Joined: 01-03-08

    Just pay up already, Samsung

  1. Charles Martin

    MacNN Editor

    Joined: 08-04-01

    To quote Adam Ant: "Desperate, but not serious."

  1. slapppy

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 03-23-08

    Exactly. Pay up and stop slavishly copying Apple.

  1. Flying Meat

    Dedicated MacNNer

    Joined: 01-25-07

    I realize that it's not technically against the law to be an a-hole, but at some point a smackdown is in order. :P

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, it's not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often touted as f ...

Moshi iVisor AG and XT for iPad Air 2

Have you ever tried to put in a screen protector that relies on static to cling to the screen? How many bubbles and wrinkles does it h ...

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500 projector

Trying to find the perfect projector for a home theater can be tricky, as there are bountiful options on the market from a large numbe ...



Most Commented


Popular News