Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Apple demands anti-cloning provision in any Samsung settlement

updated 04:22 pm EST, Mon January 20, 2014

Attorneys argue over injunctions

Ahead of formal settlement negotiations next month, Apple has reiterated its demands for an anti-cloning provision in any potential agreement with Samsung. Litigation analyst Florian Mueller suggests Apple's insistence may be a "dealbreaker" that puts the patent-infringement lawsuit back on track for a formal trial, though the company successfully pushed HTC to sign off on such provisions as part of a settlement in a separate dispute.

"But no matter how much Samsung may hate the notion of an anti-cloning provision (it's definitely at odds with the strategy that enabled Samsung to become the global market leader in smartphones), it's a safe assumption that a deal will only come into being if Samsung accepts this," Mueller writes.

Apple's attorneys maintain that any previous talks with Samsung have "consistently included limits to both the scope of any license and a prohibition against cloning Apple products." The legal team denies Samsung's suggestion that settlement offers have already been made without such provisions.

Apple CEO Tim Cook is scheduled to meet with Samsung CEO Oh-Hyun Kwon sometime around February 19, however failure to reach an agreement will effectively initiate the smartphone patent trial the following March.

14-01-16 Apple Reply in Support of Permanent Injunction Against Samsung by Florian Mueller



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. buddhistMonkey

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 01-29-13

    What does it say about Samsung that an anti-cloning provision would be a deal-breaker? Actually, it doesn't tell us anything that we didn't already know.

  1. shawnde

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 04-01-08

    Well, I guess there won't be any settlement after all .... No Samsung CEO is going to agree to an "Anti-cloning" agreement .... jesus, that way, they might as well shut down Samsung.

  1. chas_m

    MacNN Staff

    Joined: 08-04-01

    That same "anti-cloning" clause goes all the way back to Apple's settlement with Microsoft. I think they can easily show the court that they've been consistent about that. What's more, that clause is what gave us Windows Phone, which -- though not doing well in the marketplace, sorry to say -- is the only genuine alternative to iOS.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Adesso Xtream S3B Bluetooth speaker

Finding a speaker purpose-built for a specific need is challenging. Even when a Bluetooth speaker can be paired with a mobile device, ...

JBL Synchros E40BT headphones

For all the different configurations of headphones on the market, it's always a tough choice for buyers to get something that is just ...

Razer Taipan mouse

The list of gaming devices is growing larger with each passing day. A large number of companies have entered the gaming input arena, a ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News