Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Judge rules Pandora to pay 1.85 percent annual revenue rate to ASCAP

updated 04:10 pm EDT, Sun March 16, 2014

Rate lower than ASCAP requested, higher than terrestrial radio

US Federal Court Judge Denise Cote has issued a ruling in a case between streaming music service Pandora and music publishers, which has set a new rate at which Pandora Radio will have to pay to the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) for performance rights on streaming radio. The rate is set slightly higher than the 1.7 percent Radio Music Licensing Committee rate for terrestrial radio Pandora argued was appropriate, but far less than the tiered rate ASCAP proposed.

Industry trade publication Billboard writes that the decision comes as a significant defeat to the organization, which has been fighting with Pandora for years over payments and streaming rights. Based on the structure that ASCAP proposed, payments would have constituted 2.5 percent of Pandora's revenue for 2013, and three percent for 2014 and 2015 (with likely rises in future years). The group also clashed with Pandora over buying a physical radio station in South Dakota in 2013, which it did in an attempt to qualify as a terrestrial radio station broadcaster, thus qualifying for the lower radio royalty rates.

How the decision will play out in another court case Pandora is fighting with BMI remains unseen, as that suit is still in the discovery stage -- but it is certainly going to have some influence. If a similar rate approach is taken in the BMI suit, Pandora would only be facing a yearly payout of less than four percent of its overall revenue to music publishers.

ASCAP CEO John LoFrumento commented on the decision, pointing out that other "recent agreements negotiated without [the] artificial constraints of a consent decree make clear that the market rate for Internet radio is significantly higher than 1.85 percent." This most likely refers to the deal that was struck with Apple over iTunes Radio, which pays 10 percent of revenues to publishers (but this rate covers both ASCAP and BMI). He went on to say that the "decision further demonstrates the need to review the entire regulatory structure."



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. James Katt

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 03-02-08

    This is the same crazy Denise Cote that is Apple's adversary. Her ruling is wrong. She is giving away the work of artists.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Adesso Xtream S3B Bluetooth speaker

Finding a speaker purpose-built for a specific need is challenging. Even when a Bluetooth speaker can be paired with a mobile device, ...

JBL Synchros E40BT headphones

For all the different configurations of headphones on the market, it's always a tough choice for buyers to get something that is just ...

Razer Taipan mouse

The list of gaming devices is growing larger with each passing day. A large number of companies have entered the gaming input arena, a ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News