Printed from

Beats Music hit just 110,992 subscribers in March, leak shows

updated 01:49 pm EDT, Tue May 13, 2014

Takeover by Apple apparently technology-oriented

Beats Music recorded having just 110,992 subscribers in March, according to a leaked royalty report obtained by The Guardian. The service launched in the US in January, but by March had managed only 49,371 individual accounts and 61,621 family accounts. Since family accounts cover up to five people that may imply many more listeners, but AT&T has also been offering 90-day free trials of the service, which could potentially make the number of paying subscribers extremely low.

Spotify, for comparison, had 1 million paying American subscribers in March. Globally the service currently has over 24 million active listeners, of which more than 6 million are paying. Spotify has been around for several years though, giving it a distinct advantage. It's thought that Beats may be doing better now that its iOS app includes in-app subscription purchases; the change has pushed Beats higher on App Store charts.

Nevertheless the numbers support the view that Apple's reported acquisition of Beats for $3.2 billion is more about technology and platforms than subscriber bases. It's speculated that Apple may be hoping to revamp iTunes Radio with new features and paid subscription options.

Another fact exposed by the leak is that Beats Music is currently paying artists just $0.00126 per play, less even than Spotify, which pays rightsholders between $0.006 and $0.0084, still often considered too little. Beats has however been seeing high use among subscribers: the 49,371 individual customers played 116.4 million tracks in March alone, or about 76 per day per person.

By Electronista Staff
Post tools:




  1. YangZone

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 05-24-00

    (If my Math is right) that would mean Apple is buying Beats for nearly $30k per subscriber...

  1. smacker

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 04-24-03

    3.2 billion for technology and platforms?! That's way too much IMO. Apple can't figure out on its own how to improve its streaming service and needs to buy this minor player for this much?! I don't get it. Apple never payed as much for any acquisition, let alone one like this. I'm baffled. Should be interesting how this plays out.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Apple 13-inch MacBook Pro (Early 2015)

Although the new darling of the Apple MacBook line up is the all-new MacBook, Apple has given its popular 13-inch MacBook Pro with Ret ...

Seagate Wireless

It seems like no matter how much internal storage is included today's mobile devices, we, as users, will always find a way to fill the ...

Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 (Android, 10.1-inch)

Lenovo is building a bigger name for itself year after year, including its devices expanding beyond desktop computers. The company's l ...



Most Commented


Popular News