Printed from

AT&T offers to obey 'open Internet' rules in exchange for DirecTV

updated 10:53 am EDT, Tue May 20, 2014

Deal approval would bind carrier to net neutrality, but interpretation possible

In an effort to help its bid to buy satellite TV carrier DirecTV, AT&T has now promised to uphold the FCC's previous 2010-era policy on net neutrality for three years following the approval of the merger, "irrespective of whether the FCC re-establishes such protections for other industry participants following the DC Circuit Court of Appeals vacating those rules." The FCC has recently voted to abolish the 2010 "Open Internet" guidelines following the court ruling.

As pointed out by Ars Technica, the pledge is similar to one made by Comcast when it purchased NBC Universal in 2011, wherein it pledged to honor the 2010 guidelines until 2018. Recently, however, Comcast executives have said that the 2010 FCC order doesn't prohibit "fast lanes," effectively nullifying its promise.

AT&T, in making the pledge, is also likely to use its own malleable definition of the 2010 guidelines. It did not specify exactly how it interpreted the order during a conference call with investors, nor in its SEC filing making the pledge. The promise could be an empty sop to the FCC in hopes of getting the deal approved, as the FCC is unlikely to enforce any promises made against a document ruled invalid by a federal court and abandoned by the agency itself. The FCC has now voted in favor of new guidelines that allow for "paid prioritization" deals such as those reluctantly entered into by Netflix to ensure priority delivery by Verizon and Comcast, though public backlash against the idea is continuing during the "public comment" period.

By Electronista Staff
Post tools:




  1. OldMacGeek

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 08-04-10

    Wow! Three whole years?! How . . . . generous . . .

  1. Sukoshi

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 08-19-09

    Yes, we promise not to get out and take advantage of our position for three whole years!! Come on baby, I'll be good to you, I promise...

  1. gprovida

    Junior Member

    Joined: 02-14-06

    I would recommend that ATT be required to Support and adopt for all ISPs to be common carrier utility. Then their behavior will be enforced by law.

  1. chimaera

    Dedicated MacNNer

    Joined: 04-08-07

    The big telecoms appear to have plenty of money available for upgrades.

    For the amount of money and debt AT&T and Comcast are collectively shelling out for their respective mega-deals, they could deploy super-fast gigabit-fiber broadband service to every single home in America. - Craig Aaron, FreePress

    Instead of merger mania, which delivers no value to the customer (higher bills remove value), telecoms should spend that money on rollouts. Especially into each others' territories. "Comcast and TW not competing in any locations" is not reason for a merger. More like reason for an antitrust investigation. Of why they appear to have a gentleman's agreement to not compete.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Seagate Wireless

It seems like no matter how much internal storage is included today's mobile devices, we, as users, will always find a way to fill the ...

Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 (Android, 10.1-inch)

Lenovo is building a bigger name for itself year after year, including its devices expanding beyond desktop computers. The company's l ...

Brother HL-L8250CDN Color Laser Printer

When it comes to selecting a printer, the process is not exactly something most people put a lot of thought into. Printers are often t ...



Most Commented


Popular News