Printed from http://www.electronista.com

Wikipedia updates Terms of Use, requires paid edit disclosures

updated 03:21 pm EDT, Mon June 16, 2014

Editors of Wikipedia must reveal if they are being paid for site changes

Wikipedia is attempting to improve the transparency and overall accuracy of the online encyclopedia, by taking a stance against companies paying for edits. A change to the Terms of Use now requires for any contributors on the site to disclose if any company or organization compensates them for editing existing or creating new posts, as such posts could introduce bias to materials offered to visitors.

The revised to the Terms of Use asks that paid editors must disclose any relationship through their profile page, the talk page alongside the edit, or as part of the edit summary, reports The Next Web. Paid editors may also be subject to other rules beyond the Terms of Use, including "specific policies on individual Wikimedia projects, or relevant laws," such as those prohibiting fraudulent advertising, and may require further disclosure.

This would in effect dissuade companies from making changes beneficial to themselves or damaging to other manufacturers, a practice employees from Microsoft, Dell, and Apple allegedly took part in a number of years ago.

"This amendment intends to provide guidance and information for good-faith editors; to assist the community and Foundation in evaluating and handling paid advocacy editing; and to allow responsiveness to local conditions and needs," notes the accompanying Letter from the Board.

While volunteer editors are not subject to the changes, it does affect employees of a gallery, library, archive, museum (GLAM) or any similar institution in instances where the edit is about the institution itself. Such employees, which can include professors, can continue to make contributions in their area of expertise without restriction, but must declare their employer for edits relating to them. "The amendment is not intended to impact participants in GLAM projects, or professors, when they are writing about topics of general interest on their own, rather than writing about their own institutions while being compensated directly quid pro quo, for example" states the board.

"Given the complexity of the issue, the Wikimedia Foundation will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the amendment, and remain open to changes as necessary to improve it."

While the request for editors to disclose financial interests in edits, Wikipedia is attempting to take a moral high ground stance. Ultimately, it is down to the users to police other editors on the site, and does little to prevent editors from simply lying about any received payments.



By Electronista Staff
Post tools:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Dell AD211 Bluetooth speaker

For all of the high-priced, over-engineered Bluetooth speakers in the electronics market, there is still room for mass-market solution ...

VisionTek 128GB USB Pocket SSD

USB flash drives dealt the death blow to both the floppy and Zip drives. While still faster than either of the old removable media, sp ...

Kodak PixPro SL10 Smart Lens Camera

Smartphone imagery still widely varies. Large Megapixel counts don't make for a good image, and the optics in some devices are lacking ...

Sponsor

toggle

Most Commented

 
toggle

Popular News