Printed from

Aereo calls for users to campaign against Supreme Court decision

updated 11:47 am EDT, Tue July 1, 2014

Start-up continues to fight courts, broadcasters over Aereo legality

Aereo is continuing its fight against broadcasters, after temporarily shutting down following a decision by the Supreme Court, by asking affected users to complain to lawmakers. An e-mail sent by Aereo founder and CEO Chet Kanojia sent out today calls for users to vent their frustrations at representatives, with the aim of changing the law to allow the start-up to continue operating.

Kanojia claims there to have been a large amount of support for Aereo in social media postings, and that the messages "have made it clear how important it is for so many Americans to have access to a cloud-based antenna to watch live broadcast television." The founder goes on to ask users to "tell your lawmakers how disappointed you are that the nation's highest court issued a decision that could deny you the right to use the antenna of your choice to access live over-the-air broadcast television."


The mail points recipients to the Protect My Antenna website, created for the crusade. Aside from reiterating arguments that consumers must be able to watch broadcast television using any antenna of their choosing, as well as providing links to briefs and opinions in its legal fight with broadcasters, the site provides contact details for representatives, both for social media and for e-mail, along with pre-written messages users can choose to send.

Aereo's shutdown on Saturday was caused by a Supreme Court ruling against the company. Voting 6-3 against, the court found that Aereo provides "public performances" under the Copyright Act, despite its protestations, with the court declaring the micro-antenna system and recordings of shows for individual users "do not distinguish Aereo's system from cable systems, which do perform publicly."

Some have questioned the technical ability of the justices, with Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor wondering about Roku license fees for content streams in an April hearing, while Justice Antonin Scalia was unaware that HBO was a cable-only service and does not offer over-the-air broadcasts.

By Electronista Staff


  1. vinnieA2

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: 03-28-05

    if they are thinking the Supreme Court gives a crap about what the people think, they are sadly mistaken. And getting legislators together to pass a bill — HA!

  1. TheGreatButcher

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: 06-11-00

    Find a new business model. You're just hitting your head against a wall now.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Apple 13-inch MacBook Pro (Early 2015)

Although the new darling of the Apple MacBook line up is the all-new MacBook, Apple has given its popular 13-inch MacBook Pro with Ret ...

Seagate Wireless

It seems like no matter how much internal storage is included today's mobile devices, we, as users, will always find a way to fill the ...

Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 (Android, 10.1-inch)

Lenovo is building a bigger name for itself year after year, including its devices expanding beyond desktop computers. The company's l ...



Most Commented


Popular News