<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>electronista | court News</title>
<link>http://www.electronista.com/</link>
<description>electronista is the leading source for electronic news. It offers news, reviews, discussion, tips, troubleshooting, links, and reviews every day. The best place for gadgets News. Period.</description>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<title>Tokyo court censors results from Google autocomplete</title>
<link>http://www.electronista.com/articles/13/04/16/results.of.searches.continue.to.link.man.to.criminal.acts/</link>
<description>&#60;img align='left' src='http://photos.macnn.com/article_images/article_thumbnail/1360179561_google-sm.jpg' border='0' width='176' height='120' /><![CDATA[A Japanese court has ordered Google to censor terms used in autocomplete that relate to one specific person. The ruling by the Tokyo District Court also awarded the unknown person 300,000 yen ($3,100) for the "mental anguish" endured, caused by the association of his name with various criminal acts in autocomplete-derived searches....]]></description>
<guid>http://www.electronista.com/articles/13/04/16/results.of.searches.continue.to.link.man.to.criminal.acts/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>UK Court of Appeal orders Apple to pay Samsung legal costs</title>
<link>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/11/11/payment.under.indemnity.basis.due.to.false.and.misleading.information/</link>
<description>&#60;img align='left' src='http://photos.macnn.com/article_images/article_thumbnail/1352045628_applesamsungukwebsitepost2thumb2.jpg' border='0' width='176' height='120' /><![CDATA[Apple has been ordered to pay Samsung's costs in its UK legal battle. The Court of Appeal made the order under an "indemnity basis," typically higher than the normal "standard" basis of legal costs, due to the "false and misleading" information placed by Apple in the first court-ordered statement on its website....]]></description>
<guid>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/11/11/payment.under.indemnity.basis.due.to.false.and.misleading.information/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Apple places second attempt at 'apology' statement online</title>
<link>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/11/04/toned.down.statement.in.response.to.uk.court.order/</link>
<description>&#60;img align='left' src='http://photos.macnn.com/article_images/article_thumbnail/1352045628_applesamsungukwebsitepost2thumb2.jpg' border='0' width='176' height='120' /><![CDATA[Apple has updated its website in order to follow a court ruling for a second time. After the UK Court of Appeal attacked the original attempt, deeming it non-compliant, Apple has put another notice up for UK-based website viewers. While toned down from the original attacking-style of the first version, the new statement forces users to scroll down in order to see it in the first place....]]></description>
<guid>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/11/04/toned.down.statement.in.response.to.uk.court.order/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 15:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>First Apple ''apology'' statement published in UK newspaper</title>
<link>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/11/02/published.statement.toned.down.from.non.compliant.text/</link>
<description>&#60;img align='left' src='http://photos.macnn.com/article_images/article_thumbnail/1351866015_applesamsungpublishedthumb.jpg' border='0' width='176' height='120' /><![CDATA[Apple has published its first printed "apology" statement, as mandated by the UK Court of Appeal. The statement appears at the bottom of page five of The Guardian, and is seemingly more restrained in its wording compared to the version that appeared on its website, which has since been removed from view....]]></description>
<guid>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/11/02/published.statement.toned.down.from.non.compliant.text/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>UK court rules Apple's Samsung statement non-compliant</title>
<link>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/11/01/apple.to.publish.amended.statement.within.48.hours/</link>
<description>&#60;img align='left' src='http://photos.macnn.com/article_images/article_thumbnail/1351250074_applesamsungukwebsitepostthumb.jpg' border='0' width='176' height='120' /><![CDATA[Apple has been attacked by the UK Court of Appeal over how the company worded its acknowledgment that Samsung did not infringe on iPad design patents. The original statement was considered not to be compliant with the court order, and Apple has been instructed to republish a more appropriate statement on its website....]]></description>
<guid>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/11/01/apple.to.publish.amended.statement.within.48.hours/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Apple adds link to Samsung judgement on UK site</title>
<link>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/10/26/published.judgement.includes.coolness.comments/</link>
<description>&#60;img align='left' src='http://photos.macnn.com/article_images/article_thumbnail/1351250074_applesamsungukwebsitepostthumb.jpg' border='0' width='176' height='120' /><![CDATA[Apple has updated its website to comply with a court order in the UK. A small link at the bottom of apple.com/uk titled "Samsung/Apple UK judgement" takes visitors to a seperate page, explaining that the High Courty of Justice of England and Wales found the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9, and Tab 7.7 do not infringe one of Apple's design patents....]]></description>
<guid>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/10/26/published.judgement.includes.coolness.comments/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Korean court bans iPhone 4, iPad 2, Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy Tab</title>
<link>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/08/24/companies.awarded.small.damages/</link>
<description>&#60;img align='left' src='http://cdn4.macnn.com/article_images/article_thumbnail/1345110970_AvS-sm.jpg' border='0' width='176' height='120' /><![CDATA[A South Korean court has ruled that both Apple and Samsung are guilty of patent infringement, bringing an end to two lawsuits filed last year. A three-judge panel outlined the split decision, which finds Apple guilty of infringing two Samsung patents and, conversely, Samsung has been found guilty of infringing one Apple patent. Both companies will be affected by product injunctions, though the mon...]]></description>
<guid>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/08/24/companies.awarded.small.damages/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court filings show Google's motivations behind book scanning</title>
<link>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/08/06/documents.from.2004.show.primary.goal.of.making.money/</link>
<description>&#60;img align='left' src='http://photos.macnn.com/article_images/article_thumbnail/1344039800_googlescan-sm.jpg' border='0' width='176' height='120' /><![CDATA[In a court filing by writer's advocate group The Authors Guild, the motivation for Google's nearly decade-long scanning of books and documents was revealed to be contrary to its stated purpose. Rather than creating a massive "card catalog" of out-of-print books, the internal Google documents show that the primary goal of the scanning was making money....]]></description>
<guid>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/08/06/documents.from.2004.show.primary.goal.of.making.money/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 03:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Apple moves for harsh judgement sanctions against Samsung</title>
<link>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/08/02/severe.misconduct.and.past.bad.behavior.over.design.patents/</link>
<description>&#60;img align='left' src='http://photos.macnn.com/news/1206/Apple-Samsung-Koh.jpg' border='0' width='176' height='120' /><![CDATA[Saying "Samsung apparently believes that it is above the law, and that it -- not this Court -- should decide what evidence the jury should see," Apple has petitioned the US District Court hearing its case against Samsung to impose a severe sanction on the South Korean smartphone maker for its stunt of releasing to the press (with an obvious intent of influencing the jury) evidence that was barred ...]]></description>
<guid>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/08/02/severe.misconduct.and.past.bad.behavior.over.design.patents/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 23:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Judge: Samsung can't show Sony-like Apple iPhone prototype</title>
<link>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/07/30/latest.in.string.of.samsung.requests.denied.by.judge/</link>
<description>&#60;img align='left' src='http://photos.macnn.com/news/1206/Apple-Samsung-Koh.jpg' border='0' width='176' height='120' /><![CDATA[Samsung saw yet another procedural setback today at the opening of its trial against Apple in US District Court in San Francisco. An attempt by Samsung to frame an early iPhone prototype labeled "Jony" by Apple designers as copied from Sony -- thereby implying that stealing designs is okay if others do it also -- has been quashed. Samsung will not be permitted to present exhibits to the jury that ...]]></description>
<guid>http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/07/30/latest.in.string.of.samsung.requests.denied.by.judge/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
